Home On TV & Video 3 Considerations For Advertisers As They Travel The Path To Premium Video And CTV Supply

3 Considerations For Advertisers As They Travel The Path To Premium Video And CTV Supply

SHARE:

“On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Today’s column is written by Alex Chatfield, VP of marketplace development at Xandr.

A major challenge for buyers in the new and quickly growing video/CTV landscape is reaching consumers at scale. Unlike the programmatic display ecosystem, the premium video marketplace is fragmented across inventory owners (due to carriage agreements) and almost entirely deal-gated, or in other words, not available on the open exchange. 

While there are a number of other hurdles, access to inventory is at the top of the list. 

This inaccessibility may come as a surprise due to the influx of premium video and CTV content we’re gaining access to as consumers. However, the complexity of the path to premium video content, as well as the sheer number of paths, can be daunting and enormously time consuming for buyers.  

In order to fully address this burgeoning opportunity, buyers must be cognizant of when, where and how they are reaching consumers. Taking the following steps will help remove friction and inefficiencies in the premium video marketplace, ultimately ensuring that buyers reach valuable audiences in premium environments at scale.

  • Leverage deals and cross-device graphs to navigate consumer access points. The growing number of content providers and access points – programmers and broadcasters, MVPDs and vMVPDs, CTVs and smart TVs – means there are several ways to reach the exact same consumer on the exact same content. As a result, buyers looking to efficiently execute high quality video and CTV campaigns need to source, negotiate, and set up PMPs with every seller. This gives their programmatic buying platform the optionality to reach an audience across all available paths, increasing buyers’ chances of reaching those viewers at the lowest possible cost. This approach has made many media buyers nervous, as they worry about overexposing an audience by reaching them through multiple paths. Fortunately, cross-device graphs with frequency capping capabilities are able to manage this challenge, ensuring a positive ad experience for consumers and an efficient media buy for brands.

 

  • Form direct relationships to better understand seller monetization stacks. The video/CTV marketplace today is dominated by old school waterfalls and sellers who send unique ad requests to different supply paths. SSP partners are incentivized to sell any and all inventory they have access to, meaning they’re not always prioritizing efficient supply paths for buyers. For the most efficient path to supply, buyers must speak directly with content owners, vMVPDs and connected device manufacturers to understand their monetization stack and identify which SSP(s) to set up deals with. For example, let’s say a media owner sells inventory through SSP A, SSP B and SSP C. If a buyer solely relies upon SSPs to access said media owner’s inventory, they could be missing out on access to additional inventory, and therefore audiences, sold through SSP B and SSP C. As a media buyer, having direct relationships with sellers provides critical information to ensuring you access 100% of a publisher’s inventory across all the platforms it works with at all possible price points, leading to maximized audience reach and lower CPMs. 

 

  • Utilize a standardized deal taxonomy to unlock new opportunities. The programmatic infrastructure for premium video and CTV is still nascent. Currently, targeting signals that are critical for buyers to understand an inventory’s worth are generally missing; these include content genre, rating (e.g. age bucket, like all audiences, 13+, etc.), live or VOD, duration, and program type (episode/movie/event/etc.). However, a standardized deal taxonomy can help facilitate a more direct exchange of information between buyers and sellers, unlocking new targeting and reporting that aren’t otherwise available through a DSP.

 

For buyers looking to access premium video at scale, a significant and concerted effort is required to set yourself up for success. Buyers need to be weary of shortcuts and out-of-the-box solutions that lack a defined and rigorous approach. It’s important to ask questions and understand incentives: the difference between doing this right and haphazardly is critical.

Follow Xandr (@xandr) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

New WBD Report Makes The Case For Getting The Measurement Basics Right

Warner Bros. Discovery has a new white paper analyzing the data and methodologies of five top video measurement providers: VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, Innovid and Samba.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.