Home Mobile Facebook Abandons Plan To Curb Device-Level Data Collection After Advertiser Backlash

Facebook Abandons Plan To Curb Device-Level Data Collection After Advertiser Backlash

SHARE:

device-data-fbFacebook has pulled the plug on a plan to limit device-level data collection for mobile app campaigns in the wake of a revolt by large app marketers against the policy change.

A representative for the company confirmed to AdExchanger that Facebook will no longer stop app marketers – including some of the world’s largest mobile gaming companies – from accessing information about the individual devices to which app install ads are exposed.

“While we believe device-level reporting is not the most accurate way to properly determine advertising effectiveness, we want to provide advertisers with the choice to measure ads based on what is important to them,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “In order to provide that choice, we will continue giving advertisers the option to receive device-level reporting from our mobile measurement partners for mobile app ads.”

Back in May, Facebook notified its ad buyers and mobile measurement partners that it would stop passing them campaign data linking ads to specific devices as of Aug. 20. Going forward, it said, campaign reporting for Facebook campaigns would be limited to ad- and campaign-level data. Facebook claimed this was the most effective method for driving installs anyway.

But the news didn’t sit well with many large ad buyers, who pushed back aggressively, as detailed in a VentureBeat story in July.

In particular, game makers such as Supercell and Kabam, many of whom spend millions of dollars a month to drive and optimize installs of their apps, balked at what they saw as an unfair restriction on their ability to optimize campaigns across mobile ad networks and media sources. They also feared a data power grab by Facebook, whose relationships with logged-in users across their devices is at the heart of its “people-based marketing” strategy.

For now, at least, Facebook appears to have acknowledged that its customers have a claim on some of its device information.

The first sign that Facebook’s policy shift had met with resistance came in the form of a postponement of the change’s effective date to Nov. 4. Then, as the company continued to meet with app marketers to discuss the issue, its app-install product leads decided it was time to cancel the whole plan.

Facebook continues to claim that device-level reporting is not the best way to measure and optimize for install campaigns, but that it will do to preserve choice for advertisers.

“We want advertisers to evaluate Facebook ads based on how well they’re achieving business objectives,” its statement said. “We advise our advertisers to apply people-based measurement solutions so they can determine when they’re reaching multiple people, not just multiple devices.”

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.