Home Marketer's Note How to Decode the Offline/Online Match Process

How to Decode the Offline/Online Match Process

SHARE:

joannaoconnelrevised“Marketer’s Note” is a weekly column informing marketers about the rapidly evolving, digital marketing technology ecosystem. It is written by Joanna O’Connell, Director of Research, AdExchanger Research.  

Digital marketers are sitting on a gold mine – their own organization’s first party data– and they are finally starting to tap into it. Chances are, millions of dollars have likely been spent in the building, cleansing, segmentation, and activation of this precious marketing resource in offline and other CRM channels. As organizational siloes continue to crumble, we see more and more companies extending the use of their traditional first party data sets into digital environments, whether for suppression of messaging to existing customers, reactivation of lapsed customers or the like (there are lots of cool applications of this data!)

But, through my regular conversations with marketers, I get the sense that many find the actual process of translating their data – which often includes personally identifiable information, or PII – into usable, anonymized digital data murky and hard to understand, let alone explain to colleagues. To that end, I’d like to share some questions I’d ask potential match partners (such as LiveRamp) if I were considering them for such an endeavor:

  • What is the step-by-step process for performing the match?
  • Where does your offline data come from (Is it proprietary? Licensed from 3rd parties?)? What form does it take? How do you verify its validity and quality?
  • Where does your online data come from? i.e. How do you build and maintain a matchable cookie pool? Do you have a stable suite of partners with whom you have direct relationships? How, if at all, do you validate cookie stability and quality?
  • What kind of scale can I expect, and at what point in the process?
    • What kind of match rates do you typically see between your data set and client data sets?
    • What percentage of matched cookies are you typically able to reach?
    • Is there some kind of ramp period?
  • Do you match iteratively? What’s that process? How frequently?
  • What resources should I expect to make available from my side?
  • What contractual and legal processes – if any – will we need to go through?

As always, the above list is not intended to be exhaustive, but it should prove a helpful place to start in your efforts to decode the offline/online match process!

Thoughts, comments, send them my way!

Joanna

Follow Joanna O’Connell (@joannaoconnell ) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter. 

Must Read

People Inc.'s Patrick McCarthy (right) chats with Mula's Jason White at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.