Home Data-Driven Thinking Without The Right Precautions, Influencers Could Be At Risk For Legal Trouble

Without The Right Precautions, Influencers Could Be At Risk For Legal Trouble

SHARE:
Lartease Tiffith, Executive Vice President for Public Policy of the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB)

With summer approaching, celebrities and creators will be working overtime to lend their clout to brands and products, recommending the hottest swimwear, beverages and destinations for the season.

Let’s hope they’ve been careful.

Influence is about exposure to your brand, but it’s about legal exposure, too.

Whether you’re a creator who creates 100% of your content, a movie star or a fashion influencer busy with collaborations, you can face legal consequences if you don’t follow the law.

And based on the growing flurry of lawsuits against creators, it’s clear that many of them are dangerously unaware of the risks involved. 

Here’s what brand marketers, creators and their managers need to know to avoid hefty consequences.

The creator economy is attracting more legal scrutiny

The creator economy is changing marketing fast. According to the Winterberry Group’s Outlook for Advertising, Marketing and Data 2023, US online marketing spend for influencers alone in 2023 will be $6.9B, up 17.5% YOY.

The influence of creators is real, and regulators are taking note.

But the more influence you have and the more harm you might do, the more likely you are to stumble into legal cross-hairs. 

Last year, the SEC fined Kim Kardashian $1.26 million for failing to disclose how much she was paid to promote a cryptocurrency in Instagram posts. 

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Jimmy Fallon and NBC were sued for failing to tell viewers that a “purportedly organic segment on the Tonight Show was in reality a paid advertisement for the BAYC [Bored Ape Yacht Club] collection of NFTs and MoonPay,” according to the complaint. 

But it’s not only big names who are at risk. Smaller creators need to be careful, too.

Last year, travel influencer Cassie De Pecol was sued by the consumer protection group Travelers United over allegations that she told “increasingly bold lies” to gain more followers and repeated those lies to sell products for brands like GoDaddy, Venus Razors and Quest Nutrition. Also, she did not always disclose financial relationships in accordance with FTC guidelines.

The state of Texas sued influencer Brittany Dawn Davis, seeking up to $1 million in penalties and court fees, claiming the “individual coaching” courses she sold were nothing more than “generic and non-substantive” feedback, such as “That’s my girl! You’re killing it!” 

Highly regulated industries may pay well – but boost the risk, too

If you’re promoting a lower-cost product like toothpaste using #ad, the stakes are fairly low. Consumers aren’t at much risk of making a bad decision. But there are much more stringent regulations about advertising for financial services, and for good reason: Consumers can lose substantial amounts of money, even their entire life savings. 

Punishments for those not being careful can be swift and certain.

For one thing, you can attract the attention of the SEC. The Securities and Exchange Commission charged eight influencers in a $100 million securities fraud scheme in which they used Twitter and Discord to manipulate exchange-traded stocks.

You can also be sued. Just ask DJ Khaled, who touted disgraced cryptocurrency venture Centra Tech as a “game changer” and boxer Floyd Mayweather, who told his followers, “You can call me Floyd ‘Crypto’ Mayweather from now on.” Investors in Centra Tech sued both. Neither influencer disclosed that Centra Tech paid for their posts. And the lawsuit claimed that if the celebrities hadn’t used their influence to promote Centra Tech’s cryptocurrency, the securities and wire fraud perpetrated by the company’s owners wouldn’t have been so successful.

And it’s not just crypto content that can land creators in hot water. Tough regulations apply to any investment vehicle. And other industries – especially healthcare – are heavily regulated to guard against consumer abuse. 

Push boundaries, but don’t break laws 

Influencer marketing is here to stay. The biggest advertisers in media recognize creator content as premium content.

But as it rises in importance, influencers and their managers need to slow down and understand the necessary disclosures and labels. While some creators worry that labeling a post or story as advertising will impact engagement or authenticity, the legal and financial consequences will be far worse. Disclosures exist to protect creators and the people they influence.  

It’s easy to run into trouble with the FTC or SEC. And that kind of legal trouble can cost creators their reputation and their audience’s trust. 

The good news is there are clear guides available to keep creators on the right side of the law. The FTC has published a smart, plain English guide – it’s a useful resource for influencers and their advisors.  

When everyone follows the rules, the future of the creator economy is bright.

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow IAB and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Lartease Tiffith, click here.

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.