Home Data-Driven Thinking Is it a Mountain or a Molehill?

Is it a Mountain or a Molehill?

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking“Data-Driven Thinking” is a column written by members of the media community and containing fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Ajay Sravanapudi, CEO at LucidMedia.

Since I run a venture-backed company, I spend more time with venture capitalists than any sane person should.  Of late, one topic keeps coming up in our conversations when we discuss demand-side platforms (DSP). In fact, there is a set of inter-related questions.  Let me throw them out there:

  • Isn’t a DSP just a “feature” on an exchange?
  • Should Google buy a DSP?

I’ll let someone from Google (current or former) answer the second question.  The first question is much more interesting and one can make both cases depending on their motivation.

It is a Molehill

Yes, a DSP is really just a feature on an exchange.  Here is the reasoning:

  • The exchange provides massive scale of impressions and data.
  • A DSP simply uses the real-time bid (RTB) application programming interface (API) of an exchange to buy media and run campaigns more effectively.
  • The exchange has an ad server that can deliver campaign pacing, frequency capping, targeting, etc.
  • All that is missing is some intelligence to “auto-magically” buy media on behalf of the campaign.
  • Dozens of ad networks have done this for years on things like YieldManager  on the RightMedia Exchange (RMX).
  • If we can simply layer this “auto-magical” intelligence on the exchange then there is no need to pay for a DSP.

Using this logic, a DSP is merely a feature looking for a business model.  Insert a smug VC smile here while he or she dismisses the entrepreneur pitching a newfangled DSP.

It is a Mountain

You can surely lather some intelligent buying onto an exchange and every exchange inevitably will do so to differentiate themselves from their competitors.  But the previous analysis is based on many faulty assumptions. Let me list just a handful to start with:

  • All the exchanges will interoperate seamlessly.  Therefore, a seat on a single exchange will let you buy media from any of the others.  Yeah, good luck with that.
  • One can seamlessly blend premium placements with non-premium inventory on the exchange while fulfilling the full disclosure requirements of publishers.  Sure, and pigs can fly.
  • Universal frequency capping across all exchanges and publisher sources will be possible because data is fungible.  If you believe that one then I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
  • Special technology like content and audience targeting will be similar enough on all sources to match up audiences.   Right, and I’ll be the 45th President of the United States.

I could go on.  Now insert a truly obnoxious VC smile here while he or she tells you why all the other VCs are just sheep.

Obviously I feel strongly that it is a mountain and not a molehill.  It is far from some itty-bitty little thing.  In fact, it is a huge thing.  And, here are a few reasons why…

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

  • The scale and reach of a DSP spans multiple exchanges and can therefore deliver unmatched efficiency
  • Optimized contextual and demographic targeting—secret sauce of the differentiated DSP—provides a significant performance lift.  But it is impossible to layer any secret sauce onto the exchanges’ ecosystem without overcoming major technology and business-related hurdles.
  • Off-exchange DSPs are more nimble and can bring new capabilities to market far quicker.
  • Off-exchange DSPs can respect the rights of premium publishers, while giving agency clients the control and efficiency they need.

What do you think?

Follow LucidMedia @lucidmediaVIP and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger.com) on Twitter.

Must Read

play button with many coins isolated on blue background. The concept of monetization of the video. Making money on video content. minimal style. 3d rendering

Exclusive: Connatix And JW Player Merge To Create A One-Stop Shop For Video Monetization

On Wednesday, video monetization platforms Connatix and JW Player announced plans to merge into a new entity called JWP Connatix. The deal was first rumored in July.

HUMAN Raises $50 Million

HUMAN plans to build a deterministic ID from its tracking of more than 20 trillion digital signals per week across 3 billion devices, which will aid attribution for ecommerce.

Buyers Can Now Target High-Attention Inventory In The Trade Desk

By applying Adelaide’s Attention Unit scoring, buyers can target low-, medium- and high-attention inventory via TTD’s self-serve platform.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Should Advertisers Navigate A TikTok Ban Or Google Breakup? Just Ask Brian Wieser

The online advertising industry is staring down the barrel of not one but two potential shutdowns that could radically change where brands put their ad dollars in 2025, according to Madison and Wall’s Brian Weiser and Olivia Morley.

Intent IQ Has Patents For Ad Tech’s Most Basic Functions – And It’s Not Afraid To Use Them

An unusual dilemma has programmatic vendors and ad tech platforms worried about a flurry of potential patent infringement suits.

TikTok Video For Open Web Publishers? Outbrain Built It.

Outbrain is trying to shed its chumbox rep by bringing social media-style vertical video to mobile publishers on the open web.