Home CTV Roundup Europe Is Ahead Of Us On Convergent TV, Says tvbeat CEO Robert Farazin

Europe Is Ahead Of Us On Convergent TV, Says tvbeat CEO Robert Farazin

SHARE:
Robert Farazin, CEO & Co-Founder, tvbeat

Marketers are buying more CTV inventory programmatically than ever before. But what about linear inventory?

In recent years, broadcast cable providers and SSPs alike – like DISH Media, Charter Communications and Magnite – have experimented with ways to make linear TV buys more addressable, data-driven and programmatically transactable. 

This past August, Spectrum Reach, which is Charter’s advertising sales arm, took a step further toward that goal via a partnership with London-based ad tech company tvbeat. Advertisers will be able to programmatically transact on Spectrum’s linear inventory with the same tools they use when buying CTV inventory.

Although tvbeat was originally founded in the US in 2012, these days it has a much larger presence in European and Oceanic TV markets, where its broadcasting clients include Sky (the UK), TV4 (Sweden) and Foxtel (Australia).

I wanted to learn more about tvbeat and what marketers could expect from the partnership. So I spoke with Founder and CEO Robert Farazin, who previously founded DoubleRecall, the Y Combinator-backed ad monetization platform.

Farazin doesn’t consider tvbeat to be an SSP or a measurement provider but an “ad tech orchestration platform” that offers forecasting, planning and optimization tools to broadcasters.

The company’s goal is to help media providers maximize their effectiveness by unifying their linear and CTV inventory into a single converged system – something that Europe is, apparently, already doing much more effectively than the US.

Here are some highlights from our conversation:

AdExchanger: How would you describe what tvbeat does?

ROBERT FARAZIN: For traditional broadcasters, changing the ad stack is very hard. They had linear inventory for many years. When they added streaming, they added another ad server. Then, maybe they added some on-demand – that’s another ad server. After 10 years of doing that, they have a very fragmented environment with multiple ad execution systems. Tvbeat is an orchestration layer connecting all of that.

From your perspective, are European CTV markets substantially different from North America in terms of how things are structured?

There are maybe two high-level differences. Some of the European markets are a bit ahead in terms of converged, holistic TV. In Scandinavian markets, 90% of campaigns are converged campaigns. Traditional broadcasters sell audience-based inventory across linear, digital, everything. Based on what we’ve seen, the US market is probably 18 months behind that.

The second thing is that, in the US, I’m hearing a lot about programmatic. In other markets, they’re a bit more careful about that.

Why do you think that is?

I think the media owners are afraid to lose control.

That said, all our European and Australian customers are automating workflow, and they’re exposing their traditional inner inventory to impressions-based buying. Where they are more careful is how much of that is exposed to a DSP.

So it’s a bit closer to PMP deals.

Exactly.

A lot of industry experts argue that someday we won’t be making a distinction between linear TV and CTV. Is that something you agree with?

Yes. I’m a strong believer that we are not selling platforms anymore; we are selling audiences. But the challenge is that all these media companies are structured by the platforms, not the audiences.

Buyers don’t really care if they’re on linear or streaming. What they really care about is reaching that audience in the most efficient way.

Some markets are pushing impression-based metrics as a default metric. In some of the Scandinavian markets, they charge for impressions with co-viewing factors – not the device impressions but people-based impressions.

How do you think a focus on impressions works out for advertisers who want to focus less on what they see as vanity metrics and more on outcomes?

I would be quite surprised if everything goes into outcome measurements. I think we will see a combination of both.

Everyone has a different definition of impressions. What we are trying to do with our clients around the world is unify that for them.

This interview has been lightly edited and condensed.

Questions? Comments? Let me know your thoughts about this newsletter at victoria@adexchanger.com.

⏰ Time’s almost up! Not only is Programmatic IO New York less than a week away on September 29-30, but ScreenShift (Oct 14) and Convergent TV (March 2026) are fast approaching after that. You’ve got one day left to grab our all-access pass deal for all three events going before the offer ends on September 26 – check out more details here.

Must Read

Don’t Worry About Netflix – It’s Doing Fine Without Warner Bros. Discovery

Paramount might have outlasted and outbid Netflix in the competition to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, but Netflix is not overly fussed about the loss.

Paramount’s Upfront Pitch Is About Three Things

Paramount is merging the ad tech stacks behind Paramount+ and Pluto TV, releasing a new performance product, offering more control over ad placements and introducing dynamic ad insertion in live sports.

Hard Truths For Retail Media At The IAB Connected Commerce Summit

The IAB’s Connected Commerce event in New York City this week felt to me like the retail media industry’s first sit-down explanation to a child who is now a “big kid” and must act accordingly.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Meta Is Launching An Easy Button For CAPI

Meta is simplifying its CAPI setup and teaching its pixel new tricks, including adding an AI-powered feature that automatically pulls in data from an advertiser’s website.

TelevisaUnivision Joins The Streaming Self-Service Bandwagon

TelevisaUnivision is the latest TV publisher to join the self-serve trend that’s rising in popularity across connected TV advertising. Its streaming inventory is now available to buy through fullthrottle.ai’s self-serve platform. The collaboration includes an ad bidder designed to improve both targeting and measurement.

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

For Google Advertisers Who Overpaid The Monopoly – Don’t Hate, Arbitrate

Law firm Keller Postman is leading mass arbitration suits against Google, seeking advertiser damages for alleged monopoly overpricing. The total available pot is a quarter-trillion dollars.