Home AdExchanger Talks The Outcomes Era Is Dead. Long Live The Quality Era

The Outcomes Era Is Dead. Long Live The Quality Era

SHARE:
Erez Levin, Principal, Emet Advisory

The digital ad industry is obsessed with outcomes – to its detriment.

That’s the case made by Erez Levin, principal at media consultancy Emet Advisory, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Levin has often pushed back against the industry hype machine touting its “Outcomes Era” and the promise of advanced ad targeting and optimization based on conversion data.

By putting outcomes above all else, Levin argues, digital advertisers have incentivized publishers and platforms to take credit for driving conversions, even when their ads have little demonstrable impact on consumer behavior.

Google – where Levin worked for thirteen years as a product and strategy specialist – has benefited more than most from the outcomes-driven status quo.

But Judge Leonie Brinkema’s ruling earlier this month that Google’s ad tech business constitutes a monopoly is an opportunity for the industry to break away from the Outcomes Era and the race to the bottom that’s tainted the open web, Levin says.

Likewise, Levin says, Google’s decision last week to once again pivot its cookie strategy for its Chrome browser shows why marketers need to double down on their own methods for assessing media, rather than following Big Tech’s whims.

Much like the tide appears to be turning against Google, it may also be turning against outcomes, according to Levin. “Enough buyers have moved on from attribution,” he says. “They know it’s highly inaccurate and likely misleading.”

As a sign of the shifting tide, Levin points to Google and Meta releasing open-source MMM tools and seemingly downplaying their previous emphasis on attribution.

“Even the big guys that have benefited the most from these legacy systems know that they’re not long for this world,” Levin says, “so they’re trying to build alternatives.”

Also in this episode: Why the “lemon market” of principal media needs media quality measurement, whether probabilistic audiences should be labeled in programmatic platforms, and how Google has demonstrated that it can make or break ad tech standards like ads.txt or the new video.plcmt field for labeling online video.

For more articles featuring Erez Levin, click here.

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?