Home AdExchanger Talks Is The Alt Video Currency Juice Worth The Squeeze?

Is The Alt Video Currency Juice Worth The Squeeze?

SHARE:

Buyers and sellers are still at odds over alternative video currencies – hence the multiple (and ongoing) years of testing and learning.

While publishers and trade orgs are on a roll bestowing their stamps of approval upon newer currencies, some media buyers and working groups continue to voice concerns over transacting on data so different from that provided by the Nielsen panels that have supported TV ad buying for decades.

But what should advertisers make of all this turmoil?

The back and forth on certification and accreditation is separate from the fact that “alt currencies are ready to be used for [TV ad] transactions – period, full stop,” says Josh Chasin, VideoAmp’s former chief measurability officer, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Chasin, who left VideoAmp in January of this year, has also served as Comscore’s chief research officer and was at Arbitron before Nielsen acquired the consumer research company in 2012. He’s also a member of the Advertising Research Foundation’s board of advisors.

Buyers are using alt currencies today, Chasin says, but only up to a point. Adoption isn’t enough to topple Nielsen … yet.

One reason agencies are hesitant about alt currencies is because of FOFO: the fear of finding out. Larger data sets can help advertisers count more ad exposures than panels alone, which means media buyers will have to acknowledge to clients that some of their prior media planning may have been suboptimal. That can get pretty awkward.

Buyers are particularly uncomfortable transacting on larger data sets for linear buys, Chasin says. Unlike streaming, linear ad buying hinges on ratings based on demos, so moving to an alt currency with bigger data sets will have a more jarring impact on linear reports.


But make no mistake, he says. From advanced audiences to outcomes-based measurement, the alt currency juice is most certainly worth the squeeze.

The next hurdle is for broadcasters to get more agencies to buy in.

Also in this episode: Behind the buy-side push for show-level transparency, why audience panels are out and calibration panels are in, and what the term “big data” really means.

For more articles featuring Josh Chasin, click here.

Must Read

Has The Ad Industry Lost The Pulse Of American Consumers?

The ad industry has become a community of people who say things like “This is going to sound relatable” and follow it up with a sentence that may as well be Martian to 99% of America.

LG And Magnite Launch Agentic Home Screen Ads With A Winning NFL Quarterback

LG home screen inventory is now available through agentic buying, opening up a premium TV placement to faster, more automated campaign setup.

Prebid’s Proposed Auction Overhaul Would Do What The Court Wouldn’t: Separate AdX From GAM

Reorienting the ad auction so that ad servers bid into Prebid lets publishers access demand from Google AdX without also having to use Google’s ad server.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Meet Starling, The Startup That Says It’s More Than Just Another CTV SSP

Starling recently launched as a connected TV SSP and wants to capitalize on the opportunity to address a major pain point facing CTV marketers: the lack of show-level data.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

The Apple Bites Back

Apple has a new block list for data brokers and ad tech vendors that do cross-site user tracking – which could expand to include a much broader slate of ad tech and martech vendors across the entire ecosystem. Plus: a few thoughts on Advertising Week New York.

How Data And Ad Tech Vendors Are Preparing For The iOS 27 Fallout

Against the backdrop of Advertising Week New York this week, the programmatic ecosystem has been buzzing madly like the inhabitants of an overturned beehive after the release of Apple’s iOS 27.