Home Ad Exchange News Premium Pubs Tout Their Alternatives Amid Brand Safety Concerns – But Will Advertisers Arrive?

Premium Pubs Tout Their Alternatives Amid Brand Safety Concerns – But Will Advertisers Arrive?

SHARE:

As advertisers yank spend from YouTube and Google Display Network due to brand safety concerns, premium publishers see an opportunity.

These pubs have long complained that audience-based buying devalues the context they provide – context they claim ensures brand safety.

“Marketers are recognizing in a blunt force way the difference between a platform and publisher,” said Lindsay Nelson, CMO at Vox Media. “There will be a limitation to what a Google algorithm can control, versus a publisher like us being able to say that we own our own IP, the ad experience and the premium context.”

But publishers can’t compete with platforms’ scale. Even before YouTube’s brand safety issue emerged, these publishers worked to scale up to attract brands used to reaching millions efficiently on a platform. Those solutions include Vox Media’s Concert, Time Inc.’s ad tech-led buying options and Digital Content Next’s TrustX.

Even though Vox Media is large on its own, it partnered with NBCUniversal last April and then Condé Nast in March to give brands a place to run mobile video and display ads across Concert.

Adding Condé Nast helped Vox Media’s Concert hit 200 million uniques, and that’s when it finally clicked with the market, Nelson said.

“The conversation has been evolved to a more scale play, and the performance we can deliver,” said Ryan Pauley, general manager of Concert for Vox Media. “We have conversations that are closer to what they are having with a YouTube or Facebook versus an individual publisher.

Vox Media is not the only one that’s tried to match the scale of a large platform with a message that’s more about content. Time Inc. has done so by diving into ad tech itself, via acquisitions like Viant and Adelphic that make it easier to buy Time’s audience.

“We offer adjacency to premium, brand-safe video programming, both on our sites and across a vetted syndication network,” said Brad Elders, EVP and CRO at Time Inc.

But publishers wonder if buyers, despite their public concerns about brand safety, really care more about cheap reach than quality context.

At The New York Times, it’s more the exception than the rule that advertisers care about its high-quality news context.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“We’ve gotten the odd brief where they say, ‘We really want to work with brands like the Times or The Wall Street Journal because we want to support this coverage,” said Sebastian Tomich, SVP of advertising and innovation for the Times, during a recent AdExchanger podcast.

“But at the end of the day, the day-to-day media buyer isn’t placing a premium on that. They’re still focusing on impressions, clicks, lowest CPM and scale, scale, scale,” Tomich added.

Digital Content Next CEO Jason Kint characterizes media buyers the same way.

“Media buyers long ago turned digital into a relentless pursuit to buy the cheapest audience possible without having to pay for quality media,” Kint said.

The trade group for premium publishers launched TrustX in February – which includes Vox Media inventory – that combines the scale programmatic buyers love with high-quality publisher placements.

But although Kint has heard some agencies are considering moving to whitelists, which would benefit Digital Content Next’s member publishers, he’s not holding his breath: “I’ll believe it when I see it and I’ll stand and applaud when it happens.”

Although publisher solutions marrying scale with premium context became available a few years ago, ho-hum adoption sometimes follows splashy rollouts.

Instead of paying to access curated publisher inventory, some brands prefer to build their own blocklists, buy on the open exchange and assume their tech partners will maintain minimum brand safety standards.

Horizon Media SVP of programmatic Adam Heimlich indicated the agency is thinking more about better filtering, and not about moving budgets to more high-end contexts.

“The critical distinction is not ‘premium’ – it’s monitored,” he said.

Publishers – who have a horse in the race – vehemently disagree with this approach.

“Direct marketers don’t care so much about context, environment or brand safety,” Kint said. “If things don’t change at this point, then brand stewards are willfully driving their brands into the toilet.”

Vox Media’s Nelson echoed those concerns, but said that the spotlight on brand safety changed that mindset.

“Marketers have forgotten about what was once a central tenet of how they invested their media dollars, which was premium, contextual alignment,” she said.

But not all of them.

“I have not stopped taking calls from CMOs in the past two weeks,” Nelson said of Vox Media’s Concert. “The appetite is enormous.”

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.