Home Marketer's Note Programmatic Is Table Stakes

Programmatic Is Table Stakes

SHARE:

joannaoconnelrevised“Marketer’s Note” is a weekly column informing marketers about the rapidly evolving, digital marketing technology ecosystem. It is written by Joanna O’Connell, Director of Research, AdExchanger Research.  

As I was interviewing a senior level marketer in the beverage industry the other day for my customer lifecycle management research (which I’ll be presenting at the Industry Preview conference in January), our conversation turned to programmatic. His perspective on the subject seemed timely and well worth sharing as we race to the finish line of Q4, say goodbye to 2013, and turn our thoughts to the coming year:

“It’s silly that “programmatic” is this special thing. [More efficient targeting] is the most useful thing for us. We won’t spend less money. We’ll spend more in digital. We’ll get a better ROI. It’s a virtuous cycle.”

“There’s a little bit of laziness and a little bit of fear on [the big media agencies’] side and on the sites’ side that programmatic will ruin them – I don’t think that at all.   Not understanding it is what will really ruin them.”

The meaning is pretty clear, and he is saying something that I am hearing more and more marketers say (witness the now infamous CMO study on programmatic): I want to spend my money this way, so you’d better get on this train – agencies, publishers, technology partners – because it’s leaving the station with or without you.  I imagine there are many of you, particularly in the agency and publisher worlds, who have a million (great and not so great) reasons for, a) continuing to resist investing in building out a programmatic strategy, or b) continuing to avoid talking about what you are doing to current and prospective clients. The question is, at what point does that approach become more harmful than good?

Certainly, it’s an extremely complex issue. But, the simple message is critical to focus on – marketers increasingly believe in programmatic, and are increasingly frustrated when they’re not getting it, or not getting enough of it. So, go figure it out.

Now toss some of the complexity my way via comments and stories and we’ll keep the conversation going!

Joanna

Follow Joanna O’Connell (@joannaoconnell ) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter. 

Must Read

Predict Bowl Icon. Magician Element, Forecasting Symbol – Vector.

Why This Marketing Measurement Company Just Open-Sourced Its Forecasting Engine

MMM can tell marketers what worked, but Lifesight’s open-sourced forecasting tool aims to tell them what to do next.

Podcasts Are Becoming More Programmatic. But Now Advertisers Have To Keep The Ad Load In Check

As programmatic buying becomes more common in audio, marketers and platforms fight the temptation to cram in as many placements as possible.

PubMatic Jumps On The Show-Level CTV Targeting Bandwagon

Connected TV advertisers are still pining after show-level control. And PubMatic announced contextual targeting at the episode level is available to media buyers accessing CTV inventory through its platform.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

SQREEM Touts The Large Behavioral Model – Not The LLM – As The Winning Predictive Engine

Rather than relying on machine learning, SQREEM uses a mathematical AI model to track how systems change over time and predict audience behavior.

Comic: Game Over?

The Google Antitrust Remedies Are Too Little, Too Late – But Publishers Will Take What They Can Get

Given how much the market has changed since the Google trial began, and the wiggle room in the ruling itself, publishers aren’t expecting much relief from the court’s behavioral remedies.

Comic: "Deal ID, please."

Can Sell-Side Curation Solve The Cookieless Audience Problem For Advertisers?

Indie agency KWG says sell-side curation can target more high-performing inventory with better match rates and lower data fees than buy-side curation.