Home Data Facebook Lets Competing Advertisers Target Off Each Other’s Site And App Data

Facebook Lets Competing Advertisers Target Off Each Other’s Site And App Data

SHARE:

fb-like-dataOne of Facebook’s hidden assets is the waterfall of data signals it gets from other websites and apps.

These signals wend their way to Facebook from social plugins, conversion pixels and retargeting cookies embedded on millions of websites and mobile apps. Facebook’s code snippets tell the social network whenever a user lands on a product page, reads an article or researches a travel package. It has been collecting such data for years, but has never activated it for ad-targeting purposes.

Until now.

Facebook will soon begin using data signals gathered from its publisher integrations to inform ad messaging, creating profiles based on a far more complete universe of potentially interested buyers than it has ever made available to advertisers before. In making the announcement, Facebook also said it will offer more robust user privacy controls, including opting out of this new stream of intent data.

This could get awkward fast, since Facebook will effectively be selling data from one advertiser to its competitors – perhaps generating targeted fashion ads from Target based in part on a person’s interest in swimwear gathered from a visit to HM.com.

“Advertisers may now potentially be suppliers of ‘signal’ for their competitors to buy ads against,” is how Rob Leathern, former CEO at Facebook PMD Optimal Inc., put it.

Facebook says it is sensitive to such concerns, and it intends to restrict its intent profiles to broad categories (“soccer enthusiast” rather than “soccer accessories shoppers”).

“We’re going to build this so that no single marketer’s data will disproportionately represent what we use to improve our ads targeting or ads delivery capabilities. In principle, this means larger marketers won’t disproportionately benefit their competitors,” it said in a statement to AdExchanger.

Additionally, website owners will be able to opt out of having data generated from their websites or mobile apps used for purposes of ads targeting. However, if they do so, they lose access to other marketers’ Web and app interest data.

In other words, if you want access to Facebook’s full arsenal of ad-targeting tools, you have to pay with your site and app data.

History suggests Facebook will keep the targeting broad, according to Marc Grabowski, entrepreneur-in-residence at Highland Capital Partners and a former senior executive at Nanigans and Yahoo.

“There is a decade of precedence with publishers anonymizing and aggregating data sets for category targeting purposes,” Grabowski said. “Publishers frequently use category-specific click data to inform behavioral targeting audiences, but less frequently leverage advertiser website landing-page data, as that can be considered crossing the line of data ownership.”

The extent to which site owners with valuable data will go with the flow, or ask to be removed from Facebook’s program, may depend on the nature of each advertiser and its strategic considerations.

Jewelry retailer Alex and Ani is one advertiser that will participate.

“The value of what we’re getting outweighs the risk of giving up data to a competitive set,” said Ryan Bonifacino, VP of digital strategy for the brand. Informing competitor campaigns is not a large concern, he said. “We assume that very forward-thinking sophisticated organizations can get our (shopper data) anyway. The Sephoras of the world have the ability to target Alex and Ani customers if they want to.”

Bonifacino does have a gripe for Facebook about the new program: “My major issue is a lack of education not only with our brand but with every other customer.”

Alex and Ani’s comfort with Facebook intent targeting can be partly attributed to the relatively short consideration cycle for the casual jewelry it sells. Marketers in the automotive, travel and financial categories are likely to fret more.

“This is great for brands who may not have a deep first-party data asset as they will be able to benefit from data gathered on vertically relevant sites and apps,” said Grabowski of Highland Capital Partners. “This will become especially interesting if category specific desktop website data can be leveraged to target audiences using mobile devices.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Infillion Acquires Foursquare, Adding More Location Data To Its Ever-Growing Ad Tech Stack

Infillion checked in with its latest acquisition on Friday: Foursquare. Apparently, if there’s a strategically interesting or distressed ad tech asset on the market, Infillion will find it.

HBO MAX’s Reddit Account Was Compromised And Used For Ad Fraud

A week ago, HBO MAX had its verified Reddit account overrun by a hacker group, which eluded notice for two days while it ran 108 different ad permutations targeting an unknown number of Redditors.

Gaming Wants To Prove It’s Just Like Other Media Channels – While Also Owning How It’s Different

Adapting other channels’ strategies might be what gaming platforms need to do to get advertisers comfortable spending more. Leaning into gaming’s differentiators will come later, after bigger budgets arrive.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Clickbait

Taboola Eyes The Finance Vertical With An Offer To Acquire Ad Network Dianomi

Taboola has made an offer to buy Dianomi, a UK-based ad tech company that connects financial advertisers with premium business and finance publishers.

How The Try Guys Turned Their Love For Liquid I.V. Into A Brand Deal

When a creator already loves the product they’re marketing, it’s easy to work it into their content in ways that feel natural. That’s exactly what the Try Guys did.

Comic: The Showdown

The Court Just Unsealed Judge Brinkema’s Remedies Decision In The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Case. Here’s Your TL;DR

The court has unsealed Judge Leonie Brinkema’s full remedies opinion in US v. Google (ad tech edition). So, what’s in there?