More Ad Networks Coming, Not Less - Says Jeremy Liew of Lightspeed Venture Partners

By
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Jeremy Liew of Lightspeed Venture PartnersJeremy Liew is Managing Director at Lightspeed Venture Partners, a global venture capital firm, and frequently writes on the LSVP blog.

AdExchanger.com: In your April 6 LSVP blog post, you say there will be more ad networks not less. Why?

JL: There are four elements that you need to be able to run a successful ad network:

  1. Access to inventory - which has become commoditized by the ad exchanges.
  2. Good data for targeting - which is becoming commoditized through companies such as Lookery and Blue Kai
  3. Good targeting algorithms - which is often over-rated - more data usually beats a better algorithm.
  4. Access to advertisers/sales execution - which has become the gating issue, and there are lots of good sales people who have a spike with advertisers in a geography, demographic or vertical area who can now set up shop on their own.

Through your entrepreneurial lens, who and/or what models in the advertising tech world is taking advantage of this valley in the economy right now? Any predictions on ad tech models that get funding in the next year or two?

If I knew, I'd be an entrepreneur, not a VC! VCs are better editors than authors. Hopefully I will recognize that great idea when they come pitch me.

Early strength with ad exchanges has been in performance display advertising / direct response. Do you see brand advertisers participating in the exchange in the future?


Yes. Brand advertising hasn't been as measurable as performance advertising, so it has largely required a leap of faith. But as the metrics improve, we'll likely see brand advertisers also making the jump.

Large, "premium" publishers are trying to steady their falling CPMs by cutting out their former network partners. Are large publishers getting it right with this walled garden strategy? Any better ideas?

One of the ways that publishers can maintain their premium has been to do more integrated campaigns and this intrinsically works better when you're vertically integrated versus when sales is disaggregated from the rest of the publisher. I think that this will continue to be a viable strategy.

How must the media buying agency model evolve in the increasingly, digitally optimized world of online advertising?

Some agencies are already trying to create their own exchanges (WPP etc). They control the advertisers dollars, so they really are in the drivers seat.

Will Google own the display ad exchange model eventually? And, assuming privacy can be overcome, do you see search retargeting as a driver in this ownership?

It isn't clear that Google will win the exchange model. It isn't clear who will. We're still in the early stages. Search retargeting is one driver of value, but as data gets commodized (see Q1 above) it won't be the only way to drive value. Direct sales execution will be of key importance and that hasn't been an area that Google has historically excelled in.

Follow Jeremy Liew (@jeremysliew) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger.com) on Twitter.

  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Email This Post Email This Post

By on at

4 Responses to “More Ad Networks Coming, Not Less - Says Jeremy Liew of Lightspeed Venture Partners”


  1. Div Bhansali says:

    It's certainly an interesting premise, but of the four criteria Jeremy laid out for a successful network, clearly the most problematic for any new entrant is the sales execution. But isn't that always the most difficult hurdle to overcome for a new entrant in virtually any industry? The ability to differentiate (via marketing) and articulate (via sales) is what defines the strongest competitors and keeps them moving forward, even in data-transparent industries where the apparent cost of entry is minimal. It's why Platform-A is moving aggresively into new sales channels, as well as into self-service with BidPlace SB. It's almost impossible to differentiate solely on inventory or data, but better client acquisition and retention methods still make all the difference.

    Bottom line: while sales execution is only one of many factors in the success of a network, it's still the most difficult to penetrate. Some new market entrants are doing it exceptionally well; I suspect many of the others will find it to be an insurmountable challenge.

  2. jeremy liew says:

    Div,

    I agree; sales execution is the most difficult thing to excel in, and Avenue A is well positioned to diversify given their account control in a lot of advertisers. However, as the rest of the ad network value chain becomes commoditized, this allows small groups of ad sales professionals to potentially break out on their own and carry client relationships with them. Additionally, as international becomes more important, it is hard to imagine that a US based ad network will do a better job of sales execution than a locally grown team that knows the market and the advertisers. That is where I think some of the proliferation may come from

  3. Tim Ogilvie says:

    My guess is that this area looks more and more like the financial services / brokerage world where strong individual salespeople "own" their client relationships and bring them from one firm to another if/when they switch.

  4. Zach Coelius says:

    Even more important will be data, vertical specific knowledge and technology that will allow sales guys to carve off niches where they can deliver results. I agree that more companies are coming.

Leave a Reply