Why The Ad Industry Should Care About Core Web Vitals – And The Impact For Publishers Who Ignore The Dreaded “Layout Shift”

Amanda Hicks Washington Post

The Sell Sider” is a column written for the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Amanda Hicks, director of product for The Washington Post's Research, Experimentation & Development (RED) team.

In the ever-evolving struggle to maximize traffic and ad revenue, publishers increasingly favor search traffic to bring audiences to their sites. However, publishers will soon need to balance the design and rendering of their pages necessary to boost SEO rankings against the flashy ad experiences historically demanded by many deep-pocketed advertisers. 

The stakes are high: For most publishers, traffic from search is equal to or greater than traffic from all social platforms combined, comprising 23 percent of traffic to North American publishing sites in Q2 of 2020, according to Chartbeat. SEO is the lifeblood of the publishing industry, generating pageviews to support the monetization of brand advertisements, many that often come in the form of large, heavy ad formats. 

In May 2021 Google is adding three key markers for user interaction to its SEO ranking as a means to improve user experience across the web. Core Web Vitals is an evolving set of three metrics that, if implemented by publishers correctly, can lead to better search ranking, higher performing ads, and, ultimately, higher ad revenue. However, publishers who ignore Web Vitals may not only see ad performance suffer, but their SEO ranking, traffic and overall advertising revenue could take a hit as well.

Pay Attention to “Cumulative Layout Shift”

Core Web Vitals includes three key metrics, one of the three metrics will be the toughest issue for publishers to tackle: Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). This metric gauges the visual stability of elements on the page and is one the biggest publisher offenders in Web Vitals measurements. 

Why? CLS is negatively impacted when dynamic elements load on a page. The main dynamic offender: large ads that expand outside of an ad container, which have been historically demanded by many prominent advertisers. If you, as a reader, have ever seen article text and headlines load initially in one place only to have them shift around because an ad loads a split-second later, you’re seeing high Cumulative Layout Shift. CLS will be a daunting metric for publishers to get under control, with many publishers currently measuring CLS scores 10 to 20 times higher than Google’s passing grade.

However, publishers must improve their scores. Google is experimenting with a badge system, where if a site is slow to load because of poor Web Vitals metrics, it will receive a red progress bar as a “badge of shame” to indicate poor quality. Faster sites and those with lower CLS will have green progress bars visible to readers in the Chrome browser and load nearly instantly. A passing Web Vitals score will therefore not only favor a publisher’s  SEO ranking, but also will serve as a visual indicator of quality to readers, preventing users from exiting a particular site. I anticipate advertiser dollars shifting away from red-badged sites toward publishers with passing Web Vitals scores.

What Publishers Can Do to Fix Shifting Layouts

For CLS in particular, advertising technology and ad-serving best practices can have a big impact on whether an article passes or fails Web Vitals. A lower CLS metric will yield a higher SEO ranking and a better user experience, in turn leading to higher pageviews and thus higher advertising revenue. Additionally, several of the improvements publishers should make to improve CLS will also result in an increase in ad viewability (the frequency an ad is rendered within a user’s observable viewport), a metric critically important to advertisers due to its impact on ad engagement and ROI. 

Here are three changes that publishers can make to realize big improvements in their CLS metric:

  1. Reserve adequate space for dynamic ads before load: This may seem obvious, but it’s a particularly tricky issue for publishers, as they usually allow different height ad units to serve in a single ad slot to maximize competition in programmatic auctions. Many publishers also refresh their ad calls if a user remains idle for too long, and thus the height can theoretically change more than once. The end result: a reader could be trying to read the first few lines of text in an article only to have the article text jump 100+ pixels. Publishers should look to address this issue by reserving the largest height an ad could possibly be and clearly labeling the ad container. Publishers also should investigate their refresh logic and enable refresh only to ads of the same height, preventing a CLS-killing “jump.” 
  2. Stop serving giant, expanding, inline ads: Most publisher ad slots that run within the body of an article are 250 pixels or shorter. However, many publishers and ad tech vendors serve ads that far exceed this height. In the future, publishers will need to weigh the short-term revenue from these larger ads against the long-term health of SEO traffic. Publishers will need to evaluate this ROI closely, and where possible, make adjustments to their own ad formats to prevent this jump. One option to still render larger ads without an impact to CLS that publishers should investigate is taking advantage of the entire reserved ad space, including the ad container padding. This would allow for a slightly larger ad without a negative impact to CLS. 
  3. Reserve fixed height for right rail ads: For section or large-scale homepage takeovers, a publisher knows that the same creative assets should appear for all users. These takeovers often showcase big, beautiful designs that might traditionally fall outside standard ad container sizes. In cases where the height of an ad can be known before the page is loaded, publishers should plan to reserve the height of the (often taller) ad units they plan to load at the time the page is rendered. To achieve this, publishers can schedule the loading of taller slots in conjunction with broad takeovers.

If publishers act quickly to make changes to their Core Web Vitals measurements ahead of Google’s spring rollout, they will be positioned ahead of the competition and better able to deliver both reader and advertiser value. 

Having passing Web Vitals scores and an optimized reader experience means readers will not negatively associate the advertiser’s ads, often the cause for a negative CLS, with a site loading poorly. Publishers who fix jumpy layouts will be well positioned atop the search engine results list -- a place of power for both readers and advertisers.

Enjoying this content?

Sign up to be an AdExchanger Member today and get unlimited access to articles like this, plus proprietary data and research, conference discounts, on-demand access to event content, and more!

Join Today!

 

Add a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>