Home The Sell Sider Identity Reality Check: Most Identity Solutions Will Fail

Identity Reality Check: Most Identity Solutions Will Fail

SHARE:

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Ian Trider, VP of RTB platform operations at Centro.

If there are at least 80 companies purporting to offer identity solutions, surely the ad tech industry is set, right? Nope. I would argue that most of these companies will fail for technical, business, or policy reasons.

The prospects of identity solutions can be evaluated on the presence or absence of the following three key elements. If these elements are present, it is at least possible for these technology providers to succeed.

Without them, it’s just another exercise in wasted time for advertisers and publishers.

Element #1: A Compliant Method To Create and Store IDs

Browsers and device makers have made their stance very clear: any means of tracking users must use approved methods. Google, Apple, and Mozilla have stated that any tracking that does not use approved methods will be considered covert tracking/policy circumvention and they will seek to stop it.

Identity requires the creation and storage of an ID so the user can be recognized later. This must be done in a way that does not run afoul of these policies or it will be short-lived. In order to comply with their policies, identity will have to be derived from users signing into a publisher website and stored in a first-party cookie on that site.

Any other means of generating a cross-site pseudonymous ID, or linking an ID across sites without explicit user login on each site, involves fingerprinting or other “unintended” techniques. These techniques will not meet with those tracking policies.

Element #2: A Business and Technical Plan to Get IDs into RTB Bid Requests

Creating a piece of code that identifies users doesn’t mean that identity can be actionable for media buying. DSPs need to be able to use this identity code to perform audience targeting, frequency capping, etc.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But DSPs can only act on a user based on the data in a bid request. They don’t get to run code on the user’s computer until they serve the ad. At that point, it would be too late, so the publisher and exchange need to be involved to supply an ID in bid requests.

Putting identity into a bid request requires a secure mechanism or process for (a) passing IDs from publishers to exchanges and (b) for exchanges to pass those IDs onwards to DSPs. This technical challenge already has multiple technical solutions. The more significant roadblock is the gargantuan business development effort required to get publishers and exchanges to adopt. ID solutions must have a critical mass of publisher and exchange buy-in or they won’t be useful for advertisers.

Element #3: Consumer Transparency and Control

 Consumer expectations and growing regulatory scrutiny is driving the need for consumer transparency and control. Consumers must be able to observe that tracking is occurring, and who is tracking them. Consumers must be able to exert control technologically over the tracking.

In practice, this means that consumers should be able to prevent being tracked, rather than just requesting that data companies don’t track them. Today, consumers can prevent tracking with cookies. Other methodologies often lack that tracking control.

Covert tracking methodologies inherently fail here – they cannot be observed or reliably controlled. A user who is being tracked via a fingerprint has no reasonable way to know that it’s happening. Nor would they know how to stop it.

Probabilistic methods of identity also fail this test. Consumer privacy rights must be reliably respected. Since probabilistic identity is not guaranteed to consistently and reliably identify the user, their privacy preferences cannot be guaranteed to be respected.

Evaluating Partners Using These Three Elements

 These three elements form a basis for evaluating whether a given identity solution has a realistic prospect of success.

Some questions to ask include:

  • How are you determining the user ID? Is it based on a user logging in? If not, how do you generate an ID without running afoul of browser policy?
  • Are you attempting to identify the user across sites, and if so, how does that comply with policy?
  • How will you get your IDs from publisher to exchange to DSP to target audiences?
  • How do consumers know they are being tracked and how do they control it?

Identity providers that can’t rationalize their answers with the aforementioned elements will never get off the ground. Or, their efforts will come to an abrupt end at the hands of regulators, browser makers, or both.

Identity providers that can provide answers that satisfy these three requirements will have a chance at becoming the industry standard.

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

A few years ago, “data clean rooms” were all the ad tech trades could talk about. Fast-forward to 2026, and maybe advertisers don’t need to know what a data clean room is after all.

The AI Search Reckoning Is Dismantling Open Web Traffic – And Publishers May Never Recover

Publishers have been losing 20%, 30% and in some cases even as much as 90% of their traffic and revenue over the past year due to the rise of zero-click AI search.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

No Waiting for May – CES Is Where The TV Upfront Season Starts 

If any single event can be considered the jumping-off point for TV upfronts, it’s the Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES), which kicks off this week in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Comic: This Is Our Year

Comic: This Is Our Year

It’s been 15 years since this comic first ran in January 2011, and there’s something both quaint and timeless about it. Here’s to more (and more) transparency in 2026, and happy New Year!

From AI To SPO: The Top 10 AdExchanger Guest Columns Of 2025

The generative AI trend generated endless hot takes this year, but the ad industry also had plenty to say about growing competition between DSPs and SSPs. Here are AdExchanger’s top 10 most popular guest columns of 2025 and why they resonated.