Home Privacy Why The IAB Tech Lab Still Hasn’t Taken On The Administrator Role For Unified ID 2.0

Why The IAB Tech Lab Still Hasn’t Taken On The Administrator Role For Unified ID 2.0

SHARE:
The IAB Tech Lab is still on the fence as to whether it should take on the administrator role for Unified ID 2.0.
Man sitting on the fence. Vector artwork concept of undecided, indecisive, thinking, doubt, uncertain, and choosing options between two alternatives.

Nothing in ad tech is ever easy.

Despite previously signaling interest in serving as an administrator for Unified ID 2.0 earlier this year, the IAB Tech Lab is still on the fence about taking on this role for the open-source initiative to replace third-party cookies with email-based IDs.

During a Tech Lab board meeting last Thursday, a vote on the matter was tabled for further discussion.

“Tech Lab assuming the administrator role for Unified ID 2.0 is being actively explored, but no decision has been made,” a spokesperson told AdExchanger. “We will provide an update when we have something to share with the industry.”

So, what’s the holdup?

One issue has to do with the fact that the Tech Lab doesn’t feel comfortable taking on the role of admin as currently defined in The Trade Desk’s technical specs for Unified ID 2.0, according to someone with knowledge of the matter who asked to remain anonymous.

The administrator’s main job is to be in charge of a centralized database of sorts and manage access to the UID2 partner ecosystem. That means distributing encryption keys to UID2 operators, distributing decryption keys to compliant members, sending UID2 opt-out requests to operators and DSPs and auditing participants for compliance. The administrator must also shut off bad actors that abuse the ID.

It’s that last bit the IAB Tech Lab board isn’t comfortable with, as in pulling the plug if a partner violates UID2’s code of conduct.

The Trade Desk, however, is pushing for an industry entity to take on the responsibility of controlling the kill switch for UID2.

Hence, the impasse.

Back in February, though, the IAB Tech Lab seemed close to sealing the deal. In a blog post, Jordan Mitchell, then the IAB Tech Lab’s SVP of privacy, identity and data (he left in April), noted that the Tech Lab is well suited to the serve the technical role of UID2 admin and manage the open-source software powering UID2 in collaboration with other industry players.

But the devil clearly lives in the details on this one.

Beyond the current structure of the role, the Tech Lab is also concerned about policing the use of UID2 in countries with strict privacy laws, like the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe.

If the IAB Tech Lab does eventually take on a modified version of the admin role, Europe and potentially other countries, such as Brazil and India, will likely be carved out, at least to start.

GDPR violations carry a hefty fine and no one wants to be the one left holding a bag full of potential liability.

But all that said, the IAB Tech Lab board appears willing to move forward as an admin as long as it’s not on the hook for shutting down the baddies.

And although the admin role is still TBD, the Tech Lab has already taken on a few other functions related to the initiative, including hosting the open source code repositories for UID2 on GitHub.

The next step will be to set up a follow-up board meeting dedicated to the topic of UID2, likely for sometime in the new year. This meeting will include a vote.

One of the reasons a vote didn’t happen at the board meeting last week is because the UID2 item appeared rather far down on a long agenda and by the time it was addressed a lot of members had already left.

The IAB Tech Lab’s board, chaired by Neal Richter, Amazon DSP’s director of advertising science, is made up of nearly 40 product and business leaders across a broad range of advertising and media companies, including Google, CafeMedia, Facebook, TikTok, LiveRamp, News Corp, ViacomCBS, Criteo, The Trade Desk, PubMatic and Neustar.

Must Read

Omnicom Investors Cheer IPG Sell-Off, Despite Weak Ad Spend In Q2

Omnicom is halfway through a major sell-off of IPG agencies. Its future looks healthier as it prunes lower-growth firms, including eliminating certain specialist firms and overlapping agencies in certain countries.

Hundreds of emails, depositions and other documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google antitrust trial, providing a fascinating look at how Google talked about its own products when no one else was watching – especially tools to counteract the rise of header bidding.

Why PubMatic Ditched Its Prebid Web Wrapper, But Never Its SDK

Earlier this month, PubMatic shelved its Prebid integration wrapper, known as OpenWrap Web, and announced it would begin recommending Playwire as an offloading-onboarding partner for the 250-odd publishers that use its wrapper.

Gareth Glaser, Co-Founder & CEO, Gamera

Google’s Buyer Direct Could Beat Agentic Ad Tech At Its Own Game

Agentic AI shows promise for direct deals. But if Google has its way, Buyer Direct could put an end to all sorts of agentic direct sales opportunities while they’re still in the cradle.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Warner Bros. Discovery Is Creating Value Out Of Dead Air With Pause Ads

Streaming publishers are banking on pause ads to bolster revenue with a more user-friendly ad experience. With programmatic standardization still pending, Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a stab at advancing the capabilities behind its own pause ad formats.

Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU

Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. 

Comic: It's Coming For You

Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access

A DSP refused to give ad industry watchdog Check My Ads a seat on its platform, even after both parties cosigned a master service agreement, citing concerns about “protections” for “vendor and supply partners.”