Home Platforms Snap Did Great In 2020 – But IOS 14 And Other External Factors Are Messing With Its Momentum This Year

Snap Did Great In 2020 – But IOS 14 And Other External Factors Are Messing With Its Momentum This Year

SHARE:
Uncertainty related to iOS 14 caused Snap’s stock to slip in after hours-trading despite beating expectations for user growth and revenue in Q4 2020.
Minsk, Belarus - February 26, 2017: Snapchat logo on puzzle. Social network. Handmade. Acril painted.

Uncertainty related to iOS 14 caused Snap’s stock to slip in after hours-trading despite beating expectations for user growth and revenue in Q4 2020.

Snap added 156 million daily active users in the quarter for a total of 265 million, a 22% increase year over year. Full-year 2020 revenue was $2.5 billion, up 46% YoY, with $911 million in Q4 alone, a 62% YoY uptick.

Snapchat also doubled its advertiser count year over year in the fourth quarter and hit its highest-ever number of active advertisers (although Snap has yet to publicly share its total advertiser count).

Yet … here come those headwinds.

Snap estimates that in Q1 it will lose somewhere between $50 million and $70 million in adjusted EBITDA.

Why?

For one, Snap anticipates that Apple’s iOS platform policy changes set to roll out later this quarter will present what CFO Derek Andersen called a “risk of interruption to demand” in the period right after the policy is implemented.

Snap, of course, isn’t alone here. Facebook, Google and, oh, several million app developers are in the same boat.

“It is not yet clear what the longer term impact of those changes may be for the topline momentum of our business,” Andersen said, “and this may not be clear until several months or more after the changes are implemented.”

Jeremi Gorman, Snap’s chief business officer, noted that Snap is working closely with Apple to integrate with SKAdNetwork for measurement and also building its own solutions that will rely on aggregated data. Longer term, Snap will invest in first-party data solutions and more opportunities for on-platform conversions.

The insurrection

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But Apple’s policy changes aren’t the only external factors that could impact Snap’s momentum, which was quite good during the second half of 2020, but slower early in the new year.

For example, Snap experienced what Andersen referred to as “a period of interruption” to advertising demand during the first two weeks of January as brands paused campaigns amid events at the US Capital.

Snap therefore entered the quarter slower than it would have otherwise expected, he said.

But this slowdown was due more to general advertiser caution as opposed to any specific concerns about the brand safety of Snap’s platform, Gorman said.

She called the pauses a “minor disruption” related to overall shifts and changes in the market.

Still too early for audience network

Although Snap first started talking about Snapchat Audience Network way back in April 2019, it had little news to share.

The Snapchat Audience Network is still firmly in the experimental phase and isn’t being factored into Snap’s growth trajectory going forward.

“It’s very early with the … Audience Network and it’s not currently a significant or material part of the business at this point in time,” Anderson said.

Although Snap’s management didn’t speak specifically about the effect of Apple’s iOS 14 changes on its nascent Audience Network, one has to wonder if it’s even possible to scale such an offering at this point.

Even Facebook, whose audience network is highly scaled, is ready to jettison the business if CPMs fall too low due to an inability to effectively personalize and measure advertising following the general release of Apple’s AppTrackingTransparency framework.

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”