Home Platforms Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

SHARE:
Comic: "Protect consumer privacy!"

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27, which is the latest Apple operating system update.

IOS 27 was released on September 14.

Apple has been investigating the issue since last week, although there’s no resolution yet – at least not from The Trade Desk’s perspective.

Neither The Trade Desk nor Apple responded to requests for comment in time for publication.

The latest iOS expands upon Apple’s preexisting policy of unconditionally blocking data broker domains that do addressable ID matching and facilitate tracking across sites.

Other tracking services that were added to Apple’s block list this month include The Trade Desk-backed Unified ID 2.0 program (which uses the domain UIDAPI.com), ID5, Audigent, LiveRamp and Permutive.

But that’s not TTD’s main issue. Its problem now is that Apple added another of its domains, adsrvr.org, to the blocklist, which some programmatic insiders might recognize as TTD’s domain for third-party cookies.

And now alarm bells are going off at The Trade Desk.

“Adsrvr.org is The Trade Desk’s core ad request and delivery domain, not identity,” writes Ian Meyers, The Trade Desk’s senior director of engineering, in an urgent request to Apple’s WebKit team on WebKit Bugzilla, the platform it uses to track software issues.

In other words, Apple has done more than just block the mechanisms that The Trade Desk uses to match post-cookie identities. The other vendors WebKit blocked are straightforward identity data sellers and ID graphs. But with The Trade Desk, WebKit has effectively completely shut down the DSP’s access to Safari inventory for devices with the latest iOS.

Apple’s move underscores its unique ability to act as a sort of Sword of Damocles hanging over the ad tech industry.

Here’s the best-case scenario: The iOS 27 update inadvertently blocked The Trade Desk’s root ad serving domain. If so, the past couple weeks (and counting) will soon be just a painful memory once this is resolved – and that’s, of course, the outcome TTD is hoping for.

“Thanks, John! If you have an ETA on your findings/feedback, that would be appreciated.” That was the follow-up Meyers sent on WebKit Bugzilla last Friday to John Wilander, manager of WebKit privacy and ad tech. Wilander had responded a few days earlier in the thread that he’d seen the flag and would investigate on Apple’s end.

As of Monday, however, Wilander’s only update was, “I will let you [as in, TTD’s Meyers] know if and when any changes are available for you to test.”

In other words, it’s still possible Apple will eventually resolve this issue.

But there’s a more troubling hypothetical for The Trade Desk, which is that WebKit reaffirms its decision to unconditionally block the TTD domain.

The WebKit group has been evaluating this GitHub ticket for more than a week now and apparently hasn’t come to a conclusion about how to treat TTD’s adsrvr.org.

And there’s another wrinkle.

The Trade Desk’s WebKit bug report includes an ad call for a yahoo.com non-private browsing session that saw TTD’s bids blocked by Safari. Google’s bids, though, went through cleanly. (Although the DoubleClick brand is no more, Google still uses the “ad.doubleclick.net” domain, because while product names change all the time a cookie domain name lasts forever.)

In the past, Apple has made targeted changes to its ad tracking policies that suddenly laid low advertising systems operated by Meta and Criteo, among others. The Trade Desk is now having its own painful experience in Safari’s penalty box.

So, what’s next?

It’s TBD whether this whole incident will be easily shrugged off as a rough couple of weeks and a lesson learned about the slow pace of Apple’s updates and approvals process –  or whether it’s a sign of very rough days ahead for the programmatic open web.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here's What They're Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.