Home Online Advertising On Middlemen: Publicis And VivaKi’s Kegelman Discusses The Online Advertising Value Chain

On Middlemen: Publicis And VivaKi’s Kegelman Discusses The Online Advertising Value Chain

SHARE:

Middlemen ReactionAdExchanger.com recently asked several members of the advertising ecosystem about “Middlemen” and, specifically:

  • “Are there too many parties trying to insert themselves into the online advertising value chain? How do you see this playing out?”

The following contribution is an agency perspective from Sean Kegelman, SVP, Partnerships & Ventures, Publicis Groupe’s VivaKi.

The question of – if there are too many parties in the value chain – is about who is adding value (and who isn’t) and how interests are aligned (or not aligned).

Advertisers and media companies each have a specific goal: the former to use online advertising to achieve a goal specific to their marketing objectives; and the latter to monetize their media assets.

Today, outside of direct media buys, a bunch of players get in the middle to help assist in transactions between the two (agencies, ad networks, tech platforms, data providers, etc.). When these players are adding value by providing a more efficient or more effective way to operate, then their presence can be justified.

Before “exchanges” (and I extend this label to other inventory aggregation points that allow ad transactions at the moment of delivery), intermediaries like ad networks were a necessary link to help aggregate scale in media and data for cookie level targeting. Today’s environment creates a more common “media / advertising operating system” allowing the end points of the value chain to interact more directly. Third-parties still add value:

  • Data providers supply information not directly available to either advertisers or publishers
  • Agencies provide strategic counsel, execution, and (more holistically) integration across tactics and channels for an advertiser
  • Yield optimizers and aggregators can provide valuable mechanisms for publishers (large and small) to manage complexity and make their inventory available
  • Technology platforms provide the critical infrastructure for integrating with these media and data sources and to assist with decisioning

Others that are involved in the value chain today that don’t fall into one of these areas will either evolve to more directly align with these points or find themselves struggling to justify their role. There is a broad range of both size and type of advertisers and media companies that need to be addressed.

One area of the advertising value chain that is not as crowded today that needs more players focusing on it is performance analysis. Today the definition of performance is much too confined. It includes a remedial and narrow set of directly observable behaviors and almost no view into attitudinal impact. Companies that want to insert themselves into the value chain of online advertising will find this to be a much less crowded space, but ultimately, whoever helps solve these problems will benefit greatly by allowing the overall market to grow significantly.

More opinions on Middlemen>>>

Must Read

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.