Home On TV & Video The Future Of TV And Lessons From 1996

The Future Of TV And Lessons From 1996

SHARE:

randycooke-tvvideoOn TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Randy Cooke, vice president of programmatic TV at SpotXchange.

If you’re in the TV business, you’re painfully aware of how quickly things are changing. Less than a decade ago, TV was its own self-contained ecosystem with predictably stable audiences and a relatively clear-cut blueprint for delivering advertiser value.

Digital and mobile video, streaming video on demand, video on demand and time shifting have encroached on what was once a foundation upon which brands were built. Things could get even more complicated in the next couple of years.

Many in the industry talk a lot about “convergence,” where the monetization of TV and online video audiences are transacted within the same platform, with equitable rates and a singular currency to benchmark achieved value. While speculation on TV’s future occasionally borders on hyperbole, this transformation is very similar to change the telecommunications industry went through two decades ago.

The local number portability provision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 allowed consumers to keep their phone numbers when they switched carriers. Based on recent signals from the FCC, the liberating equivalent may be coming to TV, nearly 20 years after telecom’s transformation.

Thanks to FCC 14-210, cable, satellite and telco companies are about to see a lot more competition from the likes of Netflix, Roku, Amazon, Google and Apple. Connected device manufacturers, such as Vizio, Sony, Samsung and LG, could also enter the fray.

There are two aspects here that are noteworthy. For the first time, the FCC has defined “linear” programming, something that has been taken for granted since the advent of television. Second is the classification of a multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD).

These changes are transformational and disruptive. No longer do you need a broadcast tower or a cable plant to distribute content. Internet-based video providers can easily provision linear streams and, subsequently, conform to the FCC’s definition of a linear programmer.

Virtually every new device purchased from now on will be Internet-capable. Whether it’s a smartphone, multimedia device, desktop, tablet, gaming system or smart TV, it will be a gateway to whatever video service you want. The FCC’s new definition of MVPD means that the cable company can be whomever you want it to be, on whichever devices you prefer, wherever you go.

A new TV or next-gen gaming system could have its own “cable service” from the manufacturer, complete with local channels and no more technicians scheduling installations between the hours of 10 a.m. and next Thursday.

Devices offering incumbent video services will have a distinct advantage in this brave new world of content distribution. Manufacturers are eyeing both subscription and ad revenues in the face of shrinking margins on new devices.

Things could get very interesting very fast. If history repeats itself, two winners will emerge from the content distribution race, much like what happened in telecom. The first will be infrastructure-based distribution services that will squeeze out business models built around content curation alone. These are providers that own or possess exclusive licenses to devices, managed networks or spectrum.

The second winner will be the consumer. Irrespective of how content is distributed, the demonstrable thirst for an affordable, customized viewing experience already exhibited by the modern consumer may finally be quenched in the very near future.

Follow SpotXchange (@SpotXchange) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

CIMM Is Out To Prove That All Media Isn’t Equal

An upcoming paper from CIMM doesn’t just demonstrate that differences in media quality can be measured. It also argues that tying media value to short-term outcomes has perpetuated longstanding industry challenges.

TikTok On Why Brands Can’t Buy Its New Ad Formats Programmatically

Not unlike last year, the mood during TikTok’s NewFronts presentation last week felt like cautious optimism, if not outright relief.

Meta’s NewFronts Message To Advertisers: Embrace The Noise

Can a good sales presentation offset the impact of a very bad news week? That’s a question for Meta, which collected two guilty verdicts in court this week for failing to protect children and creating additive products.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Helps Manscaped Trim Social Chatter Down To The Bare Essentials

Meet Clamor, a new social listening product that pulls cultural insights from online conversations in real time. Clamor helped Manscaped freshen up its marketing, including for this year’s Super Bowl.

A man talking to a robot

How Red Roof Is Bringing In More Customers With Zeta’s Voice-Activated AI Agent

Hotel chain Red Roof is using Zeta’s new voice-activated AI agent to guide its campaign creation, deployment timing and audience development.

Jean-Paul Schmetz, Chief of Ads, Brave

Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads

Brave’s chief of ads Jean-Paul Schmetz on competition in the search and browser markets, the fallout from the Google Search antitrust ruling and whether AI search will help smaller upstarts compete with Big Tech.