Home On TV & Video Dataxu’s Mike Baker: Scaling A DSP In A New World Dominated By TV

Dataxu’s Mike Baker: Scaling A DSP In A New World Dominated By TV

SHARE:

The programmatic ecosystem’s maturation into the television industry happened slowly before speeding up rapidly.

Dataxu is a fitting example of the trend.

The longstanding demand-side platform (DSP) has reshaped its business and client mix in the past two years. Once a pure-play DSP, dataxu now has supply-side deals that put it in the tech stacks of programmers like Viacom and Sky TV. Dataxu is also the default targeting and measurement solution for OpenAP, a TV data consortium backed by Fox, Viacom and NBCUniversal.

In the past year, TV advertising has become dataxu’s majority revenue stream.

The TV industry is notoriously difficult to crack, but there are areas of opportunity, said dataxu CEO Mike Baker.

“Nielsen ratings are plodding along like nothing is happening with consumers,” he said.

And digital-native players like dataxu stand to gain as new go-to sources for TV measurement and audience data.

AdExchanger caught up with Baker about dataxu’s evolution into the land of TV and the supply side of the tech ecosystem.

AdExchanger: How has the revenue picture changed for dataxu as part of this transition?

MIKE BAKER: What’s driving the majority of revenue is still the DSP touchpoint. But now 80% of DSP customers are agencies.

We were known historically as a direct-to-brand DSP. But we’ve focused on agencies because they’re more self-service and involve less handholding than brands. Dataxu used to have a thicker service layer to go direct to brand. To really scale the company though we invested in the tech, so we don’t need the service.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

The majority of revenue comes from TV. Not just digital video, either, advanced TV and CTV campaigns.

How does transitioning to the world of television and TV ad margins impact the business?

Margins in TV are lower than in banner display campaigns. It’s tough for some DSPs too, because more deals occur directly between the advertiser and the programmer. So there’s a smaller cut of the campaign.

Also, in TV you get far fewer impressions for the same budget. That’s fewer transactions to have fees. That’s why we sell OneView (dataxu’s cross-device and identity product) like a DMP, with an annual subscription rate that operates independently of media spend.

But we think if you can be a value-add on both sides of the exchange in advanced TV, that’s going to be a lucrative position. For instance, in 2017 and 2018, we made changes to our business and investments in TV that required us to be unprofitable for a stretch. But we’re back in the black this year.

It seems like there’s more focus on the supply side for dataxu than people would expect from a DSP.

That’s true.

We have a hypothesis, which is to do converged TV you need a handshake relationship with programmer or distributor and advertiser.

By having embedded relationships with programmers, we can provide technology on both sides of the equation that can transact on audiences in lieu of a Nielsen or other linear TV currency.

We’re not a TV currency ourselves, but that world is gone. The currency now is your dot-com data, your TV viewership data and brand data running together for the purposes of attribution.

Is TV being bought on that data-driven model or is it still primarily on linear currencies?

Nielsen ratings are still plodding along, but data and attribution will be the prevalent mode soon. The conundrum for programmers is how to transition without cannibalizing the legacy revenue stream or just opening the door to Google and Amazon to wipe you off the face of the Earth.

Converged TV buys are gaining though.

In the United Kingdom, for instance, we work with Sky to do data-matching services between the broadcaster and agency holding companies. That’s a stronger, people-based form of measurement than panel-based currencies.

What’s driving that change most I think is DTC brands. They have the data and can connect it to digital data to have something more like Facebook-style targeting and measurement. They won’t try a new channel, even TV, if they can’t demonstrate that it works.

We had one DTC customer cancel an order with a programmer because they wanted to buy across CTV apps but also wanted data returns like digital media, which the programmer wouldn’t make available. We’re able to do data-matching between the brand and the programmer, so that that campaign can be restarted.

For that DTC brand, a Nielsen rating is just a laughable proxy.

Will TV advertising turn into something more like the programmatic buying online buyers are accustomed to?

I don’t think TV turns into open exchange programmatic. Some DSPs view the world fitting into that mold.

A lot of these TV execs are allergic to the word “programmatic.” They want automation and advanced analytics. They just don’t use the P-word.

Follow James Hercher (@JamesHercher) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter

Must Read

Pacvue Enters The Next Chapter Of Retail Media With New CEO Rahul Choraria

Pacvue has promoted COO Rahul Choraria to chief executive.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.