Home Mobile Nielsen, Deloitte, PwC And P&G All Helped Draft The CAID Spec

Nielsen, Deloitte, PwC And P&G All Helped Draft The CAID Spec

SHARE:
P&G isn’t the only western company that was deeply involved in the development of the China Advertising ID (CAID).
Smartphone in hand. Flag of China on the phone screen. Vector illustration

P&G isn’t the only western company that was deeply involved in the development of the China Advertising ID (CAID).

The China-based arms of Nielsen, Deloitte and PricewaterhouseCoopers are all listed as “drafting organizations” behind the CAID standard in the original technical specs.

CAID is an IDFA workaround that was devised for the specific purpose of circumventing Apple’s AppTrackingTransparency framework on iOS 14. It’s an open standard that relies on device fingerprinting and acts as a drop-in IDFA replacement.

For a deep dive on exactly how CAID works, click here.

P&G told The Wall Street Journal that it’s been providing input to the state-backed China Advertising Association (CAA), which is behind CAID, and declined to say whether it plans to use the identifier when it’s ready.

Regardless, the fact that well-known companies are actively helping the China Advertising Association design an IDFA substitute indicates that there is more drama ahead for Apple as it gears up to roll out ATT.

Apple is between a rock and a very hard place.

If Apple backs down and allows advertisers in certain regions to circumvent its privacy framework, it’ll be difficult to look Tim Cook in the eye when he says that “privacy is a basic human right.”

Then again, Apple, and other technology companies, have a long history of implementing different policies for different countries, particularly in China.

But although CAID has “China” in the name,” it’s an open standard.

That means there’s nothing stopping other organizations or companies from either using CAID itself or using the specs to develop something CAID-like of their own … other than Apple laying down the law.

Western companies contributed to the CAID spec.

A screen grab from an English translation of the CAID specs.

Update, April 13: According to Nielsen, it did not help draft the CAID spec.

This is Nielsen’s statement: “In China, CAA has 2,000 members, including Nielsen. Although Nielsen attends and participates in CAA meetings like we do in other industry groups, Nielsen was not actively involved in designing or developing CAID. As of April 1, 2021, Nielsen transferred the Digital Ad Ratings services business in Mainland China to Ni Er Market Research (Shanghai), a subsidiary of HYPERS.”

Must Read

New WBD Report Makes The Case For Getting The Measurement Basics Right

Warner Bros. Discovery has a new white paper analyzing the data and methodologies of five top video measurement providers: VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, Innovid and Samba.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.