Home Mobile Is Mobile Immune From The VC Funding Drought? (Not Exactly)

Is Mobile Immune From The VC Funding Drought? (Not Exactly)

SHARE:

monbilemoneySome say the ad tech venture capital funding well may be running dry, but mobile-centric companies still seem to be doing all right.

“Over the past couple of years, mobile’s been somewhat insulated from the general sentiment around ad tech, at least on the private side,” said Michael Katz, CEO and co-founder of mParticle. “Clearly Millennial Media had some struggles in the public market until AOL bought them.”

MParticle, which describes itself as a mobile data automation platform, is one of the mobile players bucking the belt-tightening trend.

The company announced $15 million in Series A on Tuesday led by Social Capital, bringing its total funding since 2013 to $19.5 million, cash it plans to put toward beefing up its existing platform and building out its integrations with marketing and analytics providers.

It’s “working capital,” Katz said, who noted that mParticle’s goal right now is to focus on generating growth rather than seeking profitability.

That’s also the plan at mobile app analytics company App Annie, which announced $63 million in fresh funding on Thursday led by Greenspring Associates. Founded in 2010, App Annie started raising cash in 2011 and has done so every year since, including a $55 million Series D in January 2015. Altogether, App Annie has raised $94 million.

One might wonder about the burn rate, but App Annie CEO and co-founder Bertrand Schmitt said the company is careful about cash management, but is looking to expand, both organically and through acquisitions, if the opportunity presents itself.

“We’re not trying to be profitable from a P&L perspective, but we are ready to invest to make sure we capitalize on opportunities,” Schmitt said. “Sometimes, we might even invest in a product for two years or more before we get a return on it, but we don’t mind doing that.”

And that’s because even though the mobile space is starting to mature, it’s still hot.

“Apps are already eating the world, especially in terms of time spent, and it just keeps getting bigger and bigger,” Schmitt said. “From that perspective, investors are excited.”

But Michael Oiknine, CEO of mobile attribution company Apsalar, which announced $8 million in Series C in November, sees clouds on the horizon – though not rain.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Consumer-facing mobile players like Snapchat and Uber are the ones eating the world. The B2B side of the equation is experiencing far less of a bonanza, he said.

“B2C companies are raising like crazy and they’ve got valuations that are absolutely enormous,” Oiknine said. “But my feeling is that ad tech is really quite dried up now. VCs just aren’t all that interested in ad tech, especially if the business is media-oriented.”

For the moment, the convergence of ad tech and mar tech is where money can be found, said Oiknine, pointing to mobile marketing automation startup Kahuna, which raised $45 million in Series B in August, as an example.

“That’s also why we were able to raise, but my feeling is that this will dry up as well, not because the business model is not sound – it’s very sound compared to media revenue – but we’re starting to see too many people doing the same thing, and it’s going to be even more difficult in mobile because of Facebook.”

Differentiation – or the lack thereof – is also a problem, said Katz.

“Historically, the challenge with ad tech has been that there’s either not a lot of differentiation or that it’s tough to tell from the outside which ones are truly differentiated,” Katz said. “Now that these markets are starting to mature, the things that remain attractive to investors are those that are either scarce or highly differentiated, and as the center of gravity becomes stronger and stronger, the pockets of opportunity become much smaller.”

Saturation and a dearth of differentiation are not a good combination, Oiknine said.

“VCs will pick up the phone and call customers to ask them what they think of company A vs. company B or C,” Oiknine said. “And a lot of the time, those customers will say, ‘I don’t know how they’re different. They all say they do the same thing.’”

Must Read

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.