Home Marketers The Startup Trying To Automate The Ad Platform Reconciliation And Refund Mess

The Startup Trying To Automate The Ad Platform Reconciliation And Refund Mess

SHARE:
Comic: Metric Meditations

Walled garden platform advertisers may not know where their ads were served or who they targeted, and have no log files to boot, but they paid for those ads all the same.

And they may have enough info to claim a refund.

That’s the idea behind the startup Vaudit, founded last year by Mike Hahn, which aims to automate the process of campaign reconciliation atop major ad platforms.

There are numerous ad fraud and brand suitability vendors in the space, Hahn told AdExchanger. “But they’re really just creating another opinion, yet another black box or point of view on the truth.”

Vaudit has raised a total of $9 million in seed funding, Hahn said. The lead investor, Omar Hamoui, founded AdMob, which was later acquired by Google, and is joined by Binh Tran, a co-founder of the social ratings and analytics company Klout.

How it works

Vaudit’s advertiser clients, primarily large enterprise brands, including Panasonic, BMW and RE/MAX, integrate Vaudit with their own ad systems, such as MMPs and campaign analytics. Vaudit can parse their clients’ ads served via platforms like Google and Meta.

Vaudit isn’t necessarily looking for fraudulent or unsuitable placements. Often, an advertiser might have stipulations that the campaign target only certain audiences, device types, creative formats, geographical regions or even particular times of day. Google’s and Meta’s platform terms give them a 5% threshold, but above that the advertiser can claim a refund if those contractual parameters aren’t met, even if the ad placement and media were perfectly sound.

Another opportunity for refunds could be an unserved ad or a “zero-second visit,” which means the page didn’t load or the user immediately closed the tab. Vaudit integrates with Google Analytics for these audits.

Mobile advertisers with major MMP integrations are particularly strong use cases for Vaudit, according to Hahn. With an MMP like Branch or AppsFlyer, there are “guardrails” that actually prevent the advertiser from being billed to start.

Unlike the usual monthly reconciliation process, when Vaudit and the MMP identify an ad served that doesn’t meet the campaign or platform standards, the payment issue can be avoided altogether.

Still, about a fifth of ads served are too deep in their respective black box to be reverse-engineered by the company, Hahn said. There is simply no way to identify where or how the ad served.

But Vaudit can help inform the advertiser on what type of inventory or campaign parameters led to types of ad placements that cannot be audited, hopefully to minimize those occurrences next time. But there’s no way to contractually demand an ad refund.

Where the money goes

Firstly, Hahn is careful to clarify that, while people use the word “refund” colloquially, it isn’t exactly the right nomenclature for ad platform billing.

Google refers to it as “adjustments,” Meta as “credits.” But the main distinction is that advertisers don’t actually get money back.

When a campaign fails to deliver on contractual terms or the platform’s terms and conditions, the advertiser receives ad credits.

Vaudit’s business model is based on a 2% media fee, plus a unique performance guarantee that the company will triple what it generates as a fee in the form of ad credits. In other words, a Vaudit client spending $100,000 on Google ads per month would pay the auditing ad tech $2,000. However, Vaudit guarantees it will generate at least $6,000 in incremental ad credits in that scenario or it doesn’t get paid at all.

Google is a close partner, Hahn said. Meta hasn’t reached “the same level of cooperation yet,” but, he added, the platforms in general want to identify bad media sources or places where campaigns are misfiring before the payment happens.

Vaudit is also in the early stages of setting up similar products for Amazon ad audits and credits.

The big platforms each have their own idiosyncrasies when it comes to how they use and report campaign data and particular rules for what counts as a valid ad. And the platforms themselves have different levels of automation they allow for campaign reconciliation.

“It’s a lot of work to get there,” Hahn said, “but that’s what makes it an audit instead of a traffic optimization.”

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.