Home Marketer's Note How to Decode the Offline/Online Match Process

How to Decode the Offline/Online Match Process

SHARE:

joannaoconnelrevised“Marketer’s Note” is a weekly column informing marketers about the rapidly evolving, digital marketing technology ecosystem. It is written by Joanna O’Connell, Director of Research, AdExchanger Research.  

Digital marketers are sitting on a gold mine – their own organization’s first party data– and they are finally starting to tap into it. Chances are, millions of dollars have likely been spent in the building, cleansing, segmentation, and activation of this precious marketing resource in offline and other CRM channels. As organizational siloes continue to crumble, we see more and more companies extending the use of their traditional first party data sets into digital environments, whether for suppression of messaging to existing customers, reactivation of lapsed customers or the like (there are lots of cool applications of this data!)

But, through my regular conversations with marketers, I get the sense that many find the actual process of translating their data – which often includes personally identifiable information, or PII – into usable, anonymized digital data murky and hard to understand, let alone explain to colleagues. To that end, I’d like to share some questions I’d ask potential match partners (such as LiveRamp) if I were considering them for such an endeavor:

  • What is the step-by-step process for performing the match?
  • Where does your offline data come from (Is it proprietary? Licensed from 3rd parties?)? What form does it take? How do you verify its validity and quality?
  • Where does your online data come from? i.e. How do you build and maintain a matchable cookie pool? Do you have a stable suite of partners with whom you have direct relationships? How, if at all, do you validate cookie stability and quality?
  • What kind of scale can I expect, and at what point in the process?
    • What kind of match rates do you typically see between your data set and client data sets?
    • What percentage of matched cookies are you typically able to reach?
    • Is there some kind of ramp period?
  • Do you match iteratively? What’s that process? How frequently?
  • What resources should I expect to make available from my side?
  • What contractual and legal processes – if any – will we need to go through?

As always, the above list is not intended to be exhaustive, but it should prove a helpful place to start in your efforts to decode the offline/online match process!

Thoughts, comments, send them my way!

Joanna

Follow Joanna O’Connell (@joannaoconnell ) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter. 

Must Read

Criteo Lays Out Its AI Ambitions And How It Might Make Money From LLMs

Criteo recently debuted new AI tech and pilot programs to a group of reporters – including a backend shopper data partnership with an unnamed LLM.

Google Ad Buyers Are (Still) Being Duped By Sophisticated Account Takeover Scams

Agency buyers are facing a new wave of Google account hijackings that steal funds and lock out admins for weeks or even months.

The Trade Desk Loses Jud Spencer, Its Longtime Engineering Lead

Spencer has exited The Trade Desk after 12 years, marking another major leadership change amid friction with ad tech trade groups and intensifying competition across the DSP landscape.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How America’s Biggest Retailers Are Rethinking Their Businesses And Their Stores

America’s biggest department stores are changing, and changing fast.

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.