Home Investment Conversant’s Q2 Tries To Focus On The Future, Not So Much The Present

Conversant’s Q2 Tries To Focus On The Future, Not So Much The Present

SHARE:

conversantSince Conversant rebranded from ValueClick and redefined itself from an ad network to an ad tech company, the choppy waters it once rode have calmed.

But last quarter, CEO John Guiliani warned Q2 2014 wouldn’t be as great, particularly due to the possibility of losing – or getting reduced business from – two of its CRM clients.

Conversant’s Q2 2014 revenues came within this guidance, clocking in at $137.4 million, a YoY increase of 7% (that being said, Conversant wasn’t in a great spot financially this time last year). Breaking Conversant down into its two revenue buckets, affiliate marketing revenue from Commission Junction was $40.6 million, (an 11% YoY increase) while its media revenue was $96.7 million (a 6% YoY increase).

The media umbrella includes Conversant’s display business as well as its CRM, mobile, video and cross-channel technologies. The growth rate in media in particular wasn’t as strong as Giuliani hoped. “I’m disappointed this year we don’t have double digits, and I definitely will be next year” if we don’t, he said.

“We’re not there yet,” he added, though he tried to focus on the positive by emphasizing “the things we’ve done to position ourselves for the future, the changing market, and the differentiated products we have.”

Analysts in particular were disappointed with the performance of the company’s media margins, which stagnated between Q2 2013 and Q2 2014. Giuliani said he’s comfortable with Conversant’s focus on adding value via better quality inventory at the expense of gross margins.

Conversant’s vision is to become a “personalization platform” – one that aligns its various tech assets (a demand-side platform from Dotomi, ad serving and tracking technology, tag management, mobile in-app advertising, Commission Junction’s affiliate marketing and the traditional ValueClick media network), all sharing a common data source.

Consequently, Giuliani tried to focus the earnings call on Conversant’s new and upcoming products.

“Video remains an investment focus for us,” he said. “It represented a signficant share of our hiring in Q2 and we anticipate that will remain the case in the future as well.”

Giuliani also said he hopes to trot out a suite of video products using assets it acquired from SET Media, which provides contextual targeting around video.

Conversant has also established an internal private exchange with direct publishers, through which Giuliani said gives clients an option before putting their inventory on the open market.

“It’s a build off our prior publisher relationships, though not exclusively,” Giuliani said. “We’re adding new ones as well.”

He added that for Conversant’s CRM business, which hadn’t previously been plugged in, the private exchange offers a new source of inventory. The private exchange will also help clients get higher-quality inventory, unique reach and overall better performance, Giuliani said.

Currently, the private exchange approaches 20% of Conversant’s inventory, though Giuliani expects that to expand to somewhere from one-third to a half.

Finally, Giuliani spoke of a common identification system to power its cross-device matching solutions. In this system, Conversant matches anonymous profiles to offline names and addresses.

“It’s done through a very intricate process,” Giuliani said. “It matches devices back to a home base. When we see these, we can attach the device back to a permanent ID that starts with a home base of a physical name and address.”

He added Conversant can make connections by triangulating different devices around an ID.

“We tend to get faster and better matches and because of our persistency, we tend to get a more durable ID, so we don’t have the same attrition,” he said. “We typically have a broader audience to address that’s more likely to be persistent, so we can capture more of the value. There’s more to it than that, but my guys are cautioning me not to talk about it too long.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Omnicom Investors Cheer IPG Sell-Off, Despite Weak Ad Spend In Q2

Omnicom is halfway through a major sell-off of IPG agencies. Its future looks healthier as it prunes lower-growth firms, including eliminating certain specialist firms and overlapping agencies in certain countries.

Hundreds of emails, depositions and other documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google antitrust trial, providing a fascinating look at how Google talked about its own products when no one else was watching – especially tools to counteract the rise of header bidding.

Why PubMatic Ditched Its Prebid Web Wrapper, But Never Its SDK

Earlier this month, PubMatic shelved its Prebid integration wrapper, known as OpenWrap Web, and announced it would begin recommending Playwire as an offloading-onboarding partner for the 250-odd publishers that use its wrapper.

Gareth Glaser, Co-Founder & CEO, Gamera

Google’s Buyer Direct Could Beat Agentic Ad Tech At Its Own Game

Agentic AI shows promise for direct deals. But if Google has its way, Buyer Direct could put an end to all sorts of agentic direct sales opportunities while they’re still in the cradle.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Warner Bros. Discovery Is Creating Value Out Of Dead Air With Pause Ads

Streaming publishers are banking on pause ads to bolster revenue with a more user-friendly ad experience. With programmatic standardization still pending, Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a stab at advancing the capabilities behind its own pause ad formats.

Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU

Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. 

Comic: It's Coming For You

Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access

A DSP refused to give ad industry watchdog Check My Ads a seat on its platform, even after both parties cosigned a master service agreement, citing concerns about “protections” for “vendor and supply partners.”