Home Email Industry Reaction: Salesforce.com Acquires ExactTarget

Industry Reaction: Salesforce.com Acquires ExactTarget

SHARE:

Salesforce-buys-ExactTargetSalesforce.com added another notch to its marketing belt with the news that it had purchased email marketing and marketing automation provider ExactTarget for $2.5 billion in its biggest acquisition yet. AdExchanger reached out to several analysts and asked their thoughts on the ramifications of this deal.

 

Rebecca Wettemann, vice president, Nucleus Research

“From a functionality perspective, this is deeper bench strength for Salesforce on the marketing automation side – adding more sophisticated lead management and email marketing capabilities for both B2B and B2C customers. Cloud CRM is a very competitive market and one where vendors have to continuously prove the value of what they deliver – and deliver more to justify their annual subscription bill.  This gives Salesforce more stickiness on the marketing side. What Salesforce has done very well is quickly integrate acquisitions and productize them under the Salesforce umbrella (with Social.com just another example).  Existing customers of both Exact Target and Salesforce will get the benefit of streamlined vendor management and deeper integration.”

Paul Greenberg, president, The 56 Group

“This is a very important acquisition for Salesforce.com. ExactTarget helps them fill out what they need to fulfill their objective of providing a marketing cloud to the market. It’s not Exact Target that makes this important, though. It’s that Salesforce.com is grabbing a company – which could have been Marketo or Neolane, as far as I’m concerned – and adding what they weren’t going to build on their platform: the traditional marketing capabilities that are needed, like email marketing, campaign management and lead management that marketers even in [the] social age need regardless of the era. This will free them up to extend their platform in other areas and…to enrich the Marketing Cloud, which, once the acquisition is completed and the applications integrated, will compete with any company out there.”

Robert Brosnan, principal analyst, Forrester Research

“I think that existing Marketing Cloud customers get an additional choice of email providers – and, honestly, one of the better ones. So it’s a great win for them. What I’m more worried about is ExactTarget’s customers who are not – and likely wouldn’t become – SFDC [Salesforce.com] customers. A big retailer likely doesn’t need much of anything from SFDC, and the enhancements they need in ExactTarget will likely be delayed as ExactTarget moves to integrate into SFDC.”

Brent Leary, partner, CRM Essentials

“With Oracle snapping up Eloqua at the end of last year, and Marketo showing signs of wanting to go public a long time before they did, they [Salesforce.com] were running out of options. And options were getting costlier. So they had to make a move, and ExactTarget was a company that many analysts had picked as the best fit, especially after they bought Pardot at the end of the year, along with ExactTarget’s previous purchase of CoTweet…With respect to not going after Marketo, I think there may have been organizational/cultural reasons why that move wasn’t made.  They had been partners for years, and if it were to have happened, it probably would have been a couple years ago.”

Mary Wardley, vice president, Enterprise Applications and CRM software, IDC

“Marketing automation has been one piece of the CRM puzzle that has stood alone among specialists for a long time. It hasn’t had the expectation that it had to be part of the overall suite. As the market has evolved over time, things that were best of breed or standalone increasingly [became] pieces of functionality in the total platform, and that’s what’s happening here. For Salesforce.com’s credibility, they needed this as part of their broader platform to compete with Oracle and Microsoft.”

Must Read

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.