Home Digital TV and Video Warner Bros. Discovery Will Rely On Original Content Production And Streaming Revenue

Warner Bros. Discovery Will Rely On Original Content Production And Streaming Revenue

SHARE:
The logo of the new Warner Bros Discovery company on smartphone screen. USA April 2022

On Tuesday, Warner Bros. Discovery held its first quarterly earnings report as Warner Media and Discovery newlyweds.

Wait. Didn’t that deal JUST close?

Yes – the merger was only made official on April 8. The duo rushed home from their honeymoon to give investors a timely Q1 update.

“We’re only 18 days in, and very [much] in the early stages of integration and refining our long-term strategy,” Discovery CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels (who will remain CFO of the merged company) said on this morning’s investor conference call. “Today’s call is predominantly meant to discuss Discovery’s Q1 operating performance,” he said.

Discovery reports a 5% YOY increase in Q1 advertising revenue for U.S. markets for a total of $1.3 billion. Auto, tech and CPG verticals performed weaker compared with last year while travel, entertainment and retail “remained healthy,” Wiedenfels said.

Total revenue went up 13% to $3.16 billion.

OK. Not too bad. But it seems apparent which of the couple is currently wearing the pants. Why not wait until the combined company can offer a synchronized report?

Because the annual upfronts don’t wait. “We’re fortunate to have closed the transaction in time for this year’s upfronts,” Warner Bros. Discovery (and previously Discovery) CEO David Zaslav said.

The combined company will be able to sell a scaled streaming audience of 100 million global DTC subscribers to advertisers. Of that total, five million signed up in Q1.

Despite a lack of nicely parceled numbers for investors – “Please note we’re still working on our subscriber definitions and the focus of our subscriber reporting,” Zaslav said – he and Wiedenfels talked strategy. The combined company will look to streaming and original content production as its core growth engines.

Streaming strategy

Warner Bros. Discovery plans to merge (successful) Warner and Discovery channels into one consolidated streaming service with a flexible pricing model.

Not all channels are making the cut. “We will clearly take swift and decisive action on certain items,” Zaslav said, referring to the early demise of CNN+.Comic: Things no one asked, ever.

The hybrid AVOD and SVOD app will offer multiple pricing options. Warner Bros. Discovery plans to offer an ad-free SVOD tier along with a cheaper, ad-lite AVOD offering. It sees itself as “driving down a middle lane” between the AVOD and SVOD roads, which other major SVOD-first streamers like Netflix and Disney+ have been recently grappling with.

Original content production, along with the respective companies’ huge content libraries, will be a big chunk of the streaming picture. The content lineup includes scripted and unscripted television series from Warner, half the MGM library and a large international offering of live sports. Plus, the combined company plans to produce more than 100 series, Zaslav said.

Zaslav reassured investors that it wouldn’t favor one part of the business over the other, or overspend on content production:  “We have no religion about any one platform or window versus another – we’re [building] a balanced monetization model that optimizes value we create via diversified revenue streams. We won’t overspend [just] to drive subscriber growth [alone].”

Headwinds

It’s not all sunshine and rainbows, though.

“In my mind, there’s both good and bad news in these results,” Wiedenfels said. “Q1 operating profit for Warner Media [saw] a 33% decline, [compared with] last year, to $1.3 billion. Cash flow was down even more, declining by $2.6 billion versus the prior year.”

Not to mention the failure of CNN+.

“We’re expanding below my expectations,” Wiedenfels said. Given Q1 performance, he revised Warner Media’s profit baseline for 2022 to $500 million lower than what the CFO had anticipated.

Plus, original content production, to reel in new paying subscribers, is very expensive. “Lower marketing costs compared with last year will be partially upset by higher content production costs,” he said.

Considering this is the company’s first year together, “2022 will undoubtedly be a messy year,” Wiedenfels said. “There’s a lot of moving pieces, and [we’re] now in a somewhat less than favorable starting position.”

At the same time, Wiedenfels “remains very confident” the company’s on track to achieve its target growth projected for 2023 (it remains unclear what exactly that is), and plans to “refine a more detailed, bottoms-up combined budget and long-range plan” within 24 months.

Godspeed.

Must Read

Why Wall Street Turned Against The Trade Desk

The Trade Desk is less than a third as valuable as it was a year ago. It retains about one-tenth of its high-water market cap from December 2024, when the company was worth almost $70 billion. Why did investors lose the faith?

Garrett McGrath, President, Prebid.org

Prebid’s New President Is Its Former Chairman, Garrett McGrath

McGrath left Prebid in June following five years as board chairman after stepping down as SVP of product management at Magnite. But now, overseeing Prebid will be his full-time job.

TV Manufacturer Telly Touts Programmatic Home Screen Ads

Telly, the startup that gives away free smart TVs in exchange for data and ad exposure, is making its home screen ads available for brands to buy programmatically – and pushing for industry standards to help attract more spend. 

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Is Helping L’Oréal Brainstorm Unique Ways To Reach Male Audiences

L’Oréal adopted creative AI platform Springboards to generate creative ideas that led to a collaborative, ongoing ideation process.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

Google won’t have to break up its ads business after being declared an online monopolist. Meanwhile, Amazon faces a lawsuit from the FTC alleging that it charged advertisers more than necessary for ecommerce ads.

The FTC’s Amazon Lawsuit Is Ad Tech’s History Of Opacity Repeating Itself

Buy-side experts said it’s another example of a Big Tech platform taking advantage of the lack of transparency built into programmatic ad auctions. And they’re not optimistic change is coming.