Home Data Privacy Is An Opportunity, Not A Burden

Privacy Is An Opportunity, Not A Burden

SHARE:

privacytrustTransparency could be a way for brands to differentiate.

Because building trust with consumers is about more than telling them why your brand is great and expecting them to just believe it.

“Trust is earned in drops, but lost by the bucketful,” said Forrester principal analyst Fatemeh Khatibloo at Forrester’s Marketing Forum on Wednesday in New York City. “Transparency isn’t something we talked about in the context of customer relationships even 10 years ago, but the world has changed, and now the customer expects us to be transparent about the things that we care about.”

Things like privacy and data collection practices, for example.

The stats, however, paint a murky picture. Consumers, who often don’t read or understand privacy policies, expect their privacy to be respected. And brands have to roll with the punches.

The majority of consumers (91%) either agree or strongly agree that they’ve lost control of how personal information is collected and used by companies, according to a January report from the Pew Research Center.

At the same time, almost half of consumers (47%) are OK with providing PII as part of a value exchange with brands, while more than half of consumers (52%) incorrectly believe that the point of privacy policies is to ensure the confidentiality of their personal information, as per two other Pew studies.

There seems to be inconsistency between what consumers say they want, what they think (which is often inaccurate) and what they’re actually cool with.

Which is why clarity and repetition are key when it comes to privacy, said Buckley Slender-White, head of marketing at Automatic Labs, a tech startup that uses software to let users track everything happening inside their car, from fuel expenses and miles driven to service information and how well the engine is performing.

“One of the first things our founder did was sit down and write a privacy policy, but rather than calling in a lawyer, he wrote down a few principles,” Slender-White said.

Among them is the clearly stated fact that Automatic doesn’t sell user data or run ads against it.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“The data is yours,” Slender-White said. “It doesn’t belong to us at all. We are merely custodians of it for you and if there is anything we want to do with that data, we ask you first. That’s the reverse of the wider web and Internet of Things, where it’s more, ‘We’ll do everything with your data and maybe we’ll let you opt out of some of it.’”

Automatic Labs approaches the notice and choice issue by constantly explaining and reiterating exactly what it’s doing with its user data and why.

Users have to opt in and authorize the transaction each time they want to grant a third party or service – Nest, for example, or an insurance company – access to their data. Being required to make the decision afresh each time keeps consumers actively involved in what’s happening with their personal information.

“It becomes a repetitive process to instill our brand value in their mind,” Slender-White said. “[We see it as] an opportunity, not a burden.”

It’s better to ask than to run afoul, Khatibloo said.

“We tend to be worried as marketers about asking consumers to tick the box too many times,” she said. “But I like it as a way to reinforce brand values.”

It’s questionable, though, how realistic that would be if implemented at scale. If every brand asked for permission every time it wanted to do something – especially as the number of IoT devices continues to grow – consumers would be driven batty in short order.

Perhaps a cross-device opt-out, like the one called for by the Federal Trade Commission, is a way forward.

It’s also a little more complicated for companies that don’t have direct consumer relationships, which is usually the case in the ad tech space where consumers are generally opted in to be tracked by default.

And then there are the publishers often stuck in the middle.

Premium publishers “have a direct relationship with the consumer – they’re not advertising technology companies,” said Jason Kint, CEO of publisher trade org Digital Content Next. “They interface with the consumer every day, and whether or not they’re able to get attention or sell that attention to advertisers is based on trust.”

Must Read

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.