Home Data AudienceScience CEO Hirsch On Guaranteeing Data And Audience Validation Reporting

AudienceScience CEO Hirsch On Guaranteeing Data And Audience Validation Reporting

SHARE:

AudiencesScienceKnown as the “Quality Data Guarantee program,” AudienceScience has announced that it will start verifying its own data as well as those of other vendors in order to guarantee for clients that they’re really getting the audience they wanted. New audience verification reports will also be offered. Read the release.

AudienceScience CEO Jeff Hirsch discussed the new program and reporting as well as its implications.

AdExchanger.com: What has pushed AudienceScience to offer the Quality Data Guarantee?

JH: There are several reasons. First, we are strong believers in the notion that the creator of data has the right to determine how that data gets used. The industry needs standards to support this. AudienceScience has spent years developing relationships with thousands of data sources that specifically and contractually, spell out our right to utilize data to power campaigns for our advertiser and publisher partners. We think it is important for marketers to know, with absolute certainty, that they have the right to utilize the data powering their campaigns. Secondly, we are concerned that data collection does not always adhere to privacy guidelines. It is absolutely essential that we get this right as an industry. We have invested in a significant way to protect consumer rights and we want marketers to ask the tough questions of any company utilizing data – are consumer rights protected? Lastly, we want our partners to know that their own data is protected and that they have complete control over its collection and utilization.

The ad verification space has looked at page data. Now you’re looking at cookie data – potentially adding another layer to a complex business. Does it all come together at some point or does the marketing dollar keep getting split?

It is almost impossible to read a cookie and understand the components of the data utilized to make that cookie of value. Our guarantee is more around the transparency in the process of collection, the rights for data usage, and the focus on consumer protection. The separation of data from inventory costs has already taken place, and the company that provides the means to integrate them in a meaningful way will provide tremendous value.

Regarding pricing, what does your new Audience Verification Report cost the marketer? Any cost to have the Quality Data Guarantee?

There are no costs for this type of quality offering. It is part and parcel of everything that we do.

How will you define “quality data”?

The quality of data will be defined by the ability to leverage data, and organize it, in a way that assures the marketer reaches their target audience. The proof is in the pudding in terms of efficiency against marketing spend.

What recourse does an advertiser have if the data isn’t of the quality suggested when they bought it?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

That won’t happen with us. That’s the guarantee. We are absolute in our processes. Other vendors I cannot speak about.

How do you overcome the perception of a conflict of interest where you are verifying the data’s audience and guaranteeing its quality – and at the same time, AudienceScience is selling its own data?

We don’t sell data. We aggregate data through our platform that sees 200 billion audience events a day to power the organization of that data into meaningful audience segments. We then make those segments available to our advertiser, agency, and publisher partners via controlled distribution channels.

By John Ebbert

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.