Home Data-Driven Thinking The Cost Of Ad Fraud: Cleaner Inventory Means Higher CPMs

The Cost Of Ad Fraud: Cleaner Inventory Means Higher CPMs

SHARE:

“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Mitchell Reichgut, founder and CEO at Jun Group.

Fraudulent ads have long plagued digital advertising, and the industry is finally making serious headway against them. About $5.8 billion in fraud-related losses is projected this year, down from $7.1 billion in 2015, according to White Ops and the ANA. Malicious ads, which forcefully redirect to another page for malicious purposes, fell from 0.39% in Q1 to 0.25% in Q2. These shifts show that fraud is successfully being weeded out.

As we continue to identify and eliminate ad fraud, real quality inventory becomes easier to identify. As a result, the remaining inventory will cost more because ad fraud creates a false suppression of prices by filling the market with fake supply.

Simply put, quality publishers are getting lower CPMs because they’re up against competition that doesn’t exist. As our ability to rid the market of fraudulent inventory becomes more sophisticated, these CPMs will naturally increase with the higher demand.

We can see this with the rise of influencer marketing, where a new kind of fraud has developed. Influencer bots – accounts that mimic engagement – will cost the ad industry $1.3 billion in 2019. These bots inflate influencers’ prices by making it seem like they have more followers and engagement than they do.

It is easy to fake being an influencer by buying followers, likes and comments. Influencer fraud erodes trust in this newer ad market. It also lowers the efficiency of the overall buy. The reality is that real engagement effectively costs more, even if advertisers and their agents aren’t aware. As this type of fraud is eliminated over time, CPMs will continue to increase as demand for quality influencer impressions rises.

The same logic exists in the music streaming world. Recent estimates say streaming fraud takes as much as $300 million a year out of the pockets of artists and labels. Fraudulent streaming is an umbrella term for any illegitimate plays of music. They often take the form of “stream farms,” where banks of devices constantly play a song or artist to boost the total play count. Streaming fraud skews chart position, redistributes market share and distorts royalty payouts to the artists.

The more the industry continues to crack down on fraudulent streams, the higher each stream’s royalty payout will be because more fake streams have been weeded out. The remaining valid streams will then cost the music platforms more money, in the same way that remaining ad inventory leads to higher CPMs when more fraud gets eliminated.

Ad fraud has troubled our industry for decades; there will always be those who attempt to game the system. As our ability to identify and eliminate fraudulent inventory gets more sophisticated, we will see CPMs rise across the board. While that may make marketers’ wallets groan, they are paying for a higher-quality product and, in the long run, it will save the industry billions.

Follow Jun Group (@JunGroup) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple has an expansive library of hundreds of CDPs, ad tech and martech companies, data sellers and ID graph operators that will exist in a purgatorial state of potential exclusion from advertising to or accessing people on Apple phones and computers, according to sources.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?