Home Data-Driven Thinking The Next Debate: The Convergence Of Mar Tech And Sales Tech

The Next Debate: The Convergence Of Mar Tech And Sales Tech

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Brian Andersen, partner at LUMA Partners.

There have been numerous articles published about the convergence of ad tech and mar tech, and whether it’s happening or not.

As I presented at the AdExchanger Industry Preview conference in January, I am firmly in the camp that ad tech and mar tech are converging. However, this convergence is really centered in business-to-consumer (B2C) marketing, where advertising is front and center of a company’s marketing activities. Think P&G, Unilever, Ford, Home Depot, AT&T, American Express and other large advertisers.

But business-to-business (B2B) marketing is different. While there are innovative companies that have married ad tech and mar tech for B2B, the more prevalent interaction is between mar tech and sales tech. This is because selling goods and services to companies is a very different process than selling goods to consumers.

A buzz phrase that emerged in B2B marketing in the past couple years is account-based marketing (ABM). Since the definition of ABM seems to vary within the market, here are two definitions from industry thought leaders:

“Account-based marketing is a strategic approach that coordinates personalized marketing and sales efforts to open doors and deepen engagement at specific accounts.” – Jon Miller, CEO and co-founder at Engagio

“Instead of leveraging a set of broad-reaching programs designed to touch the largest possible number of prospective customers, an ABM strategy focuses marketing and sales resources on a defined set of targeted accounts and employs personalized campaigns designed to resonate with each individual account. With ABM, your marketing message is based on the attributes and needs of the account you’re targeting, hence the name account-based marketing.” – David Cain, former global vice president of global marketing at Marketo (currently CMO at PlanGrid)

What are the commonalities among these definitions? One is that marketing and sales are coordinated around the common goal of targeting and landing specific accounts. Another commonality: Personalized interactions are required.

However, sales tech historically has been dominated by one type of product: CRM software. But CRM software is designed mostly to enable sales management to monitor the actions of salespeople and track relationships with prospects as they move through the pipeline. What they don’t do is arm the individual salesperson to be successful in those interactions.

With US companies spending more than $800 billion on sales compensation per year, according to the Harvard Business Review, there is a huge opportunity to leverage innovative sales tech to make those resources as effective as possible. Studies by InsideSales and others have shown that companies that invest in sales-enablement technologies close bigger and more deals in less time than companies that underinvest.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

As more enterprises adopt sales technologies and implement ABM, we will naturally see more alignment between sales and marketing teams and the systems they use. And as shown in the Sales Tech LUMAscape, this also extends to post-sale activities, such as customer success and support.

Stepping back, we have all observed the significant venture investment in ad tech – or overinvestment, as many would argue – and mar tech, and we are now seeing a significant uptick in investment in sales tech. We have witnessed a significant volume of ad tech acquisitions and are seeing an increasing number of mar tech deals. We can, therefore, logically expect to see more sales tech transactions over time.

Follow LUMA (@LUMA_partners) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.