Home Data-Driven Thinking ‘M’ Stands For More Than Mobile

‘M’ Stands For More Than Mobile

SHARE:

laurenmoores“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Lauren Moores, vice president of analytics at Dstillery.

Millennials. Multicultural. Multicultural millennials.

If you are a marketer, chances are these “M” words keep you up at night. It makes sense. These are big demographic groups with big spending potential and lots of loyalty up for grabs.

The millennial generation, born between roughly 1980 and 2000, represents approximately 80 million people. Multicultural, also a broad term, refers to multiple and mixed ethnicities and backgrounds, but can include African-American, Asian, Hispanic and LGBT audiences. The combined millennial and multicultural audiences (MMC) represent nearly 40% of the US population. For marketers, they are the “next-generation consumer,” and generally the major growth vehicle for their brands.

It also makes sense that there is behavioral divergence within the millennial, multicultural and MMC labels. There’s research to support disparities on everything from brand loyalty and trust in user-generated content to media usage.

Take media usage, for example. The 25- to 34-year-old segment slightly edges out the 18- to 24-year-old segment for time spent on mobile apps, at 75 hours per month. And iHeartMedia recently revealed that Hispanic consumers spend more time listening to radio than other multicultural segment. The 18- to 24-year-old millennials turn to radio to escape, iHeartMedia says, whereas the 25- to 34-year-old segment uses radio to expand knowledge with a focus on family and novelty.

What doesn’t make sense is that so many smart marketers continue to rely on these broad labels to define their digital advertising strategies. Looking at the MMC markets singularly by demographics is a mistake. We now have the data access and technology to find the micro-audiences that will be loyalists, brand-vocates and big spenders. Those micro-audiences can be found within demographic segments, as well as spanning standard demographic parameters. And those micro-audiences can be your guide to finding more brand loyalists, by looking at behaviors that cut across age, gender and cultural affinity.

So how does a marketer tap into this audience of varying ages, gender, ethnicities and cultures? For younger brands, finding the audiences within the millennial audience is a matter of wrangling the data. With 85% of millennials using mobile and multicultural usage of mobile devices greater than other population segments, there is plenty of digital and physical data signals available to build audience and insights. A marketer can use different data streams – and, most importantly, mobility data – to gather signals on their brand audience to accurately identify true brand prospects.

For more established brands looking to engage a new audience, using demos and ethnicity as a proxy or seed set for finding the true audience is a start. Those MMCs that identify with the brand as a result of a broader campaign will provide the behavioral data and signal to find the right prospects moving forward.

For all marketers, what is important is applying good science to the data to determine who the unique audience is for their brand, line of business or specific product, rather than a simplistic and grossly inadequate label. In a multichannel world, the ultimate goal is for each brand marketer to ask: “Where should I spend my marketing dollars and what is the impact of my marketing on sales?”

Being a millennial or belonging to a particular cultural heritage are unreliable predictors of purchase for a particular brand. There’s a better way: using the data and science at our disposal to define micro-audiences and establish brand interest.

Follow Lauren Moores (@lolomoo) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Hundreds of emails, depositions and other documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google antitrust trial, providing a fascinating look at how Google talked about its own products when no one else was watching – especially tools to counteract the rise of header bidding.

Why PubMatic Ditched Its Prebid Web Wrapper, But Never Its SDK

Earlier this month, PubMatic shelved its Prebid integration wrapper, known as OpenWrap Web, and announced it would begin recommending Playwire as an offloading-onboarding partner for the 250-odd publishers that use its wrapper.

Gareth Glaser, Co-Founder & CEO, Gamera

Google’s Buyer Direct Could Beat Agentic Ad Tech At Its Own Game

Agentic AI shows promise for direct deals. But if Google has its way, Buyer Direct could put an end to all sorts of agentic direct sales opportunities while they’re still in the cradle.

How Warner Bros. Discovery Is Creating Value Out Of Dead Air With Pause Ads

Streaming publishers are banking on pause ads to bolster revenue with a more user-friendly ad experience. With programmatic standardization still pending, Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a stab at advancing the capabilities behind its own pause ad formats.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU

Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. 

Comic: It's Coming For You

Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access

A DSP refused to give ad industry watchdog Check My Ads a seat on its platform, even after both parties cosigned a master service agreement, citing concerns about “protections” for “vendor and supply partners.”

Alphabet Smashes Ad Revenue Earnings Again – But Does It Still Care About Ads?

Investors didn’t bring up Google’s advertising business or ads in general once during the Q&A portion of Alphabet’s earnings report call on Wednesday.