Home Data-Driven Thinking How Brands Can Solve Their Privacy Problem

How Brands Can Solve Their Privacy Problem

SHARE:

shainaboone“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Shaina Boone, senior vice president of marketing science at Critical Mass.

Last month marked the 25th anniversary of the World Wide Web. Since then, the Internet has enabled unprecedented access to knowledge and unlimited potential for people to communicate across the globe.

Recent history, however, has shown that the Web’s immense possibility is not without peril. Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations and highly publicized data breaches involving brands such as Target and Neiman Marcus have fuel public skepticism and downright distrust of not only the government, but also major digital players in the industry, including Google and Facebook.

All of this necessitates a more urgent conversation between brands and consumers to clarify what is actually being collected and why and how it can be used for the good of the user, such as enhancing the online experience, rather than solely being perceived as a sinister invasion of privacy.

Brand Transparency: Building A Foundation Of Trust
 

The foundation of privacy is trust. Brands and their agencies have, thus far, done a poor job at educating consumers. It is our responsibility to change that by tossing out old, legalese-laden privacy policies in favor of more prominent, easy-to-understand ones that tell the consumer what data we are using, and the steps we’re taking to protect that data and keep it anonymous.

Most importantly, we need to communicate how the data enables better and smarter experiences for them. By doing so, we can build an implicit level of trust between brands and consumers, holding ourselves accountable while giving consumers the information to help serve as a watchdog over their own data.

Realistic Consumer Expectations 

In this always-on, connected world, consumers’ expectations of brands have never been higher. This is due, in large part, to the rise of big data as the ultimate tool to deliver personalized experiences to consumers.

Despite the general concerns about privacy and data collection, consumers must understand that there are trade-offs when it comes to brand experiences online. In order for brands to deliver experiences that are tailored to their customers’ needs and preferences, a certain amount of data – preferably not personally identifiable – must be shared in exchange. It is up to brands to communicate what kind of data is being collected and how it’s being used. Then it is the consumer’s choice to decide what data they want to share, in exchange for more or fewer services.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Privacy And The Future Of The Web

As the Internet evolves, and it continually will, privacy and security will live at the center of debate – fostering either its evolution or destruction. In support of the former, the NSA spying and resulting rational consumer fear have catalyzed a movement toward increased transparency and accountability on behalf of brands, as well as placed some responsibility on consumers themselves.

Through clear, upfront communication, our industry should provide transparency in what we are doing with consumers’ data. From an accountability perspective, brands and agencies together can take ownership of this message. Agencies can assist with the creative approach and technological implementation of the communication, while brands can facilitate content development working with their legal teams. It must be a joint effort between all parties to be successful.

Ultimately, communicating with transparency will deepen trust and build stronger relationships between brands and their customers, while hopefully alleviating the current privacy concerns about data collection.

Follow Shaina Boone (@shainaboone), Critical Mass (@criticalmass) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.