Home Data-Driven Thinking Google’s Privacy Sandbox: Is It A Game Of Chicken With The CMA?

Google’s Privacy Sandbox: Is It A Game Of Chicken With The CMA?

SHARE:
Alan Chapell, President, Chapell & Associates

Everyone wants to know: Will Google deprecate cookies in 2024?

Currently, the company is doubling down on its commitment, but we all know Google has made similar claims in the past.

Will this time be different? I have a theory that Google sees a window closing and is furiously trying to move forward before it closes.

More testing will hurt the perception of the Privacy Sandbox

Google has recognized that it is unlikely the Privacy Sandbox tools will improve significantly in the short- to mid-term. In that light, the more time the marketplace has to evaluate the Privacy Sandbox – and, particularly, the Topics platform – the worse those platforms will look.

Yes, Google has been testing the Privacy Sandbox for nearly two years. However, in most of the tests conducted thus far, Google has also used third-party cookies in a large swath of the experiment. In other words, we still have very few clear, no-spin-zone comparisons of how the Privacy Sandbox tools work in practice. Google cannot rightly say the Privacy Sandbox will be viable for 2024 without torturing the definition of the word “viable.”

Latency in particular is a time bomb for the Privacy Sandbox. Google stated to the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority that it had “tested 60 sites (randomly selected) with an automation framework to load the sites hundreds of times. In aggregate, the first page load across all sites appeared to incur an additional ~100ms.” Google then claimed the number may be misleading, but questions remain. 

For example, how large were the sites tested? Did Google find a difference in latency between large sites and small sites? A difference across various creative types? 

The longer the Privacy Sandbox remains in “test” mode, the more pressure there will be on Google to provide answers to those questions. And the more difficult it will be for Google to downplay the issue caused by latency.

As anyone in the programmatic advertising space knows, speed is everything.

Faster ad loads mean more ads fit the MRC viewability metrics. Publishers can charge for those ads as viewable. A 100ms delay in an ad load means fewer ads for which publishers can charge. 

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Latency affects Google organic search rankings. While Google doesn’t publish the criteria its search algorithm uses, it’s not exactly a secret that additional latency can have a significant impact on search rankings. Latency just might push many publishers outside the threshold that Google uses for its organic search results. Put another way, the additional latency will result in less site traffic. And less site traffic means less ad revenue.

Additional latency means less time for publisher ad partners to process ad auctions. The only alternative for publishers using the Privacy Sandbox tools is to limit the number of bidders. However, the laws of economics mean the fewer bidders, the less revenue for the publisher over time. This is a lose-lose deal.

Why the urgency to deprecate cookies?

Why is Google moving full speed ahead? Competition regulators across at least three continents are closing in. And we’ve all read the more recent news that European Commission is threatening divestiture. 

But deprecating cookies resets the entire data-driven advertising marketplace. Regulators can certainly fine Google for prior acts, but maybe this reboot takes a more comprehensive breakup of Alphabet off the table. Also, Google is as well positioned for a post-cookie world as anyone. While cookie depreciation will certainly hurt Google, it will live on. 

Won’t the CMA stop Google?

In 2021, Google made binding commitments to the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) that it would not deprecate cookies until it can demonstrate a viable alternative to the marketplace. By making affirmative statements that the Privacy Sandbox tools are ready for prime time and sharing half-baked research to support those statements, Google is attempting to create a narrative that it has lived up to its CMA commitments. On some level, the company is daring the CMA to challenge Google’s claims. 

At best, the jury is still out on the Privacy Sandbox. At worst, there’s research that suggests the marketplace – particularly smaller advertisers and publishers – will experience a world of pain.

Does the CMA have the intestinal fortitude to call Google’s bluff? I’m not sure. But Google should show its math in more detail before it pulls the plug on cookies.

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow Alan Chapell and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Alan Chapell, click here.

Must Read

Comic: Traffic Jam

People Inc. Says Who Needs Google?

People Inc. is offsetting a 50% decline in Google search traffic through off-platform growth and its highest digital revenue gains in five quarters.

The MRC Wants Ad Tech To Get Honest About How Auctions Really Work

The MRC’s auction transparency standards aren’t intended to force every programmatic platform to use the same auction playbook – but platforms do have to adopt some controversial OpenRTB specs to get certified.

A TV remote framed by dollar bills and loose change

Resellers Crackdowns Are A Good Thing, Right? Well, Maybe Not For Indie CTV Publishers

SSPs have mostly either applauded or downplayed the recent crackdown on CTV resellers, but smaller publishers see it as another revenue squeeze.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The IAB Formalizes Its Measurement Initiatives Under Its New ‘Project Eidos’

The IAB unveiled its Project Eidos on Monday, a new program uniting its numerous measurement initiatives under one banner.

John Gentry, CEO, OpenX

‘I Am A Lucky And Thankful Man’: Remembering OpenX CEO John ‘JG’ Gentry

To those who knew him, John “JG” Gentry wasn’t just a CEO. He was a colleague who showed up with genuine care and curiosity.

Prebid Takes Over AdCP’s Code For Creating Sell-Side AI Agents

The group that turned header bidding software into an open standard is bringing the same approach to publisher-side AI agents.