Home Content Studio CMOs Beware: Recent Google Analytics Decisions In The EU Put Data At Peril

CMOs Beware: Recent Google Analytics Decisions In The EU Put Data At Peril


By Anders Pilgaard Andersen, senior vice president, general counsel, Adform 

Recent decisions by multiple EU data protection authorities signal the use of Google Analytics violates the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These decisions sound a warning not only to the many companies using Google Analytics but, more broadly, to any company using US-based ad tech and mar tech platforms, since most companies collect and transfer the same types of protected data.

If this sounds like your company, here’s what you should know – and what you should be thinking about as you consider how to respond.

A flurry of GDPR rulings against Google Analytics

The most recent cascade of decisions and statements send a signal that European enforcement authorities may no longer tolerate US access to data of European citizens.

In early January, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) publicly reprimanded the European Parliament for breaching the GDPR through its use of Google Analytics. A week later, the Austrian Data Protection Authority published a decision stating the use of Google Analytics violates the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

The Austrian decision was soon followed by similar decisions or press statements by the Dutch, Danish and French data protection authorities.

These decisions generally state the existing setup – where data about European citizens is collected, transferred to and stored in the US – is in breach of Article 44 of the GDPR. More specifically, authorities ruled the transfer of personal data to the US failed to be protected from the US government’s ability to look into the data under US surveillance laws.

In the past, the EU and US managed to resolve such issues through the now-invalidated Privacy Shield. But that perspective has clearly changed due to so many similar rulings over a short period of time.

Moreover, the rapid echoing of this position-change across Europe, as well as a short one-month compliance window in a French case, make it clear that authorities see this as an urgent issue and will expect companies to respond quickly.


AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

A turning point for advertisers using US-based ad tech and mar tech

The rulings against Google Analytics represent a potential bombshell for the advertising industry, given the widespread use of US-based ad tech and mar tech platforms. Any such platform which, similar to Google Analytics, processes cookie data of European data subjects is likely affected here.

Further, the French DPA said this extends to “other tools used by sites that result in the transfer of data of European internet users to the United States.” The Danish DPA noted that more cases will be issued across the EU.

Advertisers and publishers need to act now

IAB Europe continues working to make the Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF) the first GDPR-backed certification seal or code of conduct under Articles 41-42 of the GDPR for the ad tech industry. Such seal or code of conduct for the TCF as a framework would bring clarity to all stakeholders in the online advertising industry, from advertisers and technology providers to publishers and end users alike.

But can companies using US-based ad tech and mar tech afford to wait for further clarity or guidance from IAB Europe or from EU authorities? Or, at a minimum, what should advertisers and publishers do now?

The first step is to gather leading stakeholders from marketing, legal and compliance, IT operations and IT security to begin answering the following questions:

  • What data do you collect? Where is it stored? Who can access it? Ensure a full understanding of your own – and your vendors’ – flow of data.
  • How do your contractual obligations impact your compliance requirements?
  • How can you do more from a technical and security perspective – e.g., Can data be anonymized before shared?
  • Based on the above answers, do you feel confident you can continue working with US-based vendors, or should you consider alternatives?

Highly regulated industries with high attention to compliance (e.g., financial companies, telcos, etc.) are likely already in the process of determining how to reaccess their advertising vendors based on these decisions. But really, any company operating in Europe who collects data on its customers should immediately pause to begin a reevaluation exercise, like the one outlined above, to determine if it is compliant with these new decisions regarding services from US-based platforms.





Must Read

Comic: Ad-ception

The New York Times And Instacart Integrate For Shoppable Recipes

The New York Times and Instacart are partnering for shoppable recipe videos.

Experian Enters The Third-Party Data Onboarding Business

Experian entered the third-party data onboarder market on Tuesday with a new product based on its Tapad acquisition.

Albertsons Takes Its First Steps Into Non-Endemic Advertising, Retail Media’s Next Frontier

Albertsons is taking that first step into non-endemic advertising next week via a partnership with Rokt to serve ads to people who have already purchased groceries.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Marketecture Buys AdTechGod (No, Really)

Marketecture has acquired AdTechGod – an anonymous ad tech Twitter poster turned one-man content studio – and the AdTech Forum, an information resource hosted by AdTechGod and Jeremy Bloom.

Why The False Advertising Lawsuit Against Poppi Is Bad News For RMNs

This week’s dispatch explores the new trend of false advertising class-action suits in the food and CPG industry and how the evolution of online, data-driven retail media could exacerbate the problem.

Seedtag Acquires Beachfront For Deeper Roots In TV And Streaming

Contextual ad platform Seedtag acquires Beachfront, a supply-side platform that specializes in TV and video.