Home Content Studio As Publishers Pivot For Sustainability, Editorial Needs A Seat At The Table

As Publishers Pivot For Sustainability, Editorial Needs A Seat At The Table

SHARE:

By Stephanie Himoff, VP of global publishers and platforms at Outbrain

This article is sponsored by Outbrain.

Already battered by years of marginalization from walled gardens, media owners on the open web are looking over a cliff. The deprecation of third-party cookies promises to hamper targeting on their sites, threatening to wipe out 52% of their inventory’s value.

Meanwhile, the walled gardens continue to strengthen their barriers and command a greater share of every incremental dollar spent on digital. Open-web publishing is still searching for the right balance between advertising and subscriptions, still negotiating uneven paths toward first-party data, still grasping for stable ground.

One thing is clear: The problem of revenue is not one that can be divorced from product – which is to say, content. Each monetization channel implies a new direction for editorial, whether it’s native content, personalized feeds or newsletters.

The wall between business and editorial is sacrosanct for many publishers – and for good reason. But these are extraordinary times for publishers. As someone who works directly with many rev-ops teams across the globe at Outbrain, I’ve come to believe involving editors on the business side of publishing decisions is actually the ultimate sign of respect. Here’s why.

A complicated pivot and a valuable exchange

Let’s start with the substantial monetization challenges that every publisher faces today. Many of these challenges have arisen due to the mounting barriers to digital display ad revenue: ad blocking, ad blindness, plummeting CPMs, you name it. Properly monetizing content through interruptive executions has never been less feasible than it is today. The digital display ad model that drove our industry 20 years ago simply isn’t relevant anymore.

To counteract the structural decline in digital display CPMs, publishers have sought out new ad formats and more diversified revenue strategies powered, in part at least, by reader revenue. These usually take the form of tiered subscription models in which readers help fund the content either directly with their own money or indirectly with their personal data or attention. Either way, success with these models hinges on reader experience: Publishers must give readers a reason to hand over money or PII and explore paid content experiences that are integrated into the site itself.

In other words, publishers today are relying on the strength of their content experiences to build a more sustainable future. Which begs the question: Why is editorial so often denied a seat at the table when it comes time to make decisions related to the monetization of the site experience? Who understands good reader experiences better than editorial?

Rethinking the impermeable wall

Typically, when companies start talking about breaking down the wall between the editorial and business sides of a publishing organization, it conjures the image of executives peering over the shoulders of editors, telling them what to publish and how to do their jobs. But this isn’t reflective of the reality at today’s top publications.

Among editors, content quality, objectivity and a strong editorial mandate remain the top priorities. But that doesn’t mean they’re not intimately attuned into the needs of the business when it comes to retaining readers and converting their attention into revenue. Editors want to be part of the conversations that drive their companies forward, and often their voices deliver the most constructive ideas.

Editorial understands that content only connects with readers when it’s surrounded with a strong user experience. Every component of how the content is being monetized counts: ads, sign-up prompts, sponsored content, recommendations and native advertising included. When it comes to selecting and designing these elements, editorial needs to be integrated into the process all the way from high-level concepting through to execution. With a finger on the pulse of their readership, editorial can ensure that what actually appears on the site functions as intended and aligns with a strong reader experience.

Now is the time for publishers to be rewriting their future. Across the board, we see the best monetization and reader experience results when these savvy voices have a prominent seat at the table – and editors need to be able to choose their long-term partner to help them with data and make more informed decisions. Who better to understand the value of content at a profound, innate level than its masters?

 

Must Read

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.

Predict Bowl Icon. Magician Element, Forecasting Symbol – Vector.

Why This Marketing Measurement Company Just Open-Sourced Its Forecasting Engine

MMM can tell marketers what worked, but Lifesight’s open-sourced forecasting tool aims to tell them what to do next.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Podcasts Are Becoming More Programmatic. But Now Advertisers Have To Keep The Ad Load In Check

As programmatic buying becomes more common in audio, marketers and platforms fight the temptation to cram in as many placements as possible.

PubMatic Jumps On The Show-Level CTV Targeting Bandwagon

Connected TV advertisers are still pining after show-level control. And PubMatic announced contextual targeting at the episode level is available to media buyers accessing CTV inventory through its platform.

SQREEM Touts The Large Behavioral Model – Not The LLM – As The Winning Predictive Engine

Rather than relying on machine learning, SQREEM uses a mathematical AI model to track how systems change over time and predict audience behavior.