Home AdExchanger Talks There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

There’s No Such Thing As An Attribution Easy Button

SHARE:
Madan Bharadwaj, founder, M^2

There are a lot of misconceptions about ad measurement.

Some marketers believe media mix modeling is superior to multi-touch attribution or that it’s possible to pinpoint the exact impact of each marketing touch point on sales. (Neither is true.)

But the biggest thing most marketers are wrongheaded about is in thinking there’s a single solution for attribution.

It simply doesn’t exist, says attribution expert Madan Bharadwaj, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

“There is no one technique to rule them all,” says Bharadwaj, who founded M^2 (pronounced M-Squared) in 2022, a measurement startup focused on advanced marketing attribution solutions.

Before that, Bharadwaj co-founded media effectiveness startup Measured and was VP of product management at attribution vendor Visual IQ before the Nielsen acquisition in 2017, where he helped launch the first algorithmic MTA product.

“You have to bring [multiple approaches] together,” he says. “The magic or the mystery is in how it comes together for your brand.”

There’s no single method that can account for all factors because, fundamentally, measuring the effectiveness of advertising is about measuring the complexity of human behavior.

“We can only understand human behavior to a certain level of precision,” Bharadwaj says.

If, for example, you measure the effect of media on behavioral patterns through an incrementality test or if you make estimations through a regression model, like MMM, you will get similar answers, Bharadwaj says, “but not exactly the same answer.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Which is why marketers should triangulate measurements from multiple sources before making any single investment decision.

“That is an important concept that’s slowly beginning to take root in the industry,” Bharadwaj says, “that there is no one source of truth.”

Also in this episode: Base attribution vs. advanced attribution, whether marketers can trust platform-provided measurement (sort of, not really), how to accurately benchmark media channels. Also: Spitballing attribution-themed cocktail names. (Anyone care for a refreshing “Incrementality on the Beach”?)

For more articles featuring Madan Bharadwaj, click here.

Must Read

Jamie Seltzer, global chief data and technology officer, Havas Media Network, speaks to AdExchanger at CES 2026.

CES 2026: What’s Real – And What’s BS – When It Comes To AI

Ad industry experts call out trends to watch in 2026 and separate the real AI use cases having an impact today from the AI hype they heard at CES.

New Startup Pinch AI Tackles The Growing Problem Of Ecommerce Return Scams

Fraud is eating into retail profits. A new startup called Pinch AI just launched with $5 million in funding to fight back.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

CPG Data Seller SPINS Moves Into Media With MikMak Acquisition

On Wednesday, retail and CPG data company SPINS added a new piece with its acquisition of MikMak, a click-to-buy ad tech and analytics startup that helps optimize their commerce media.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Valvoline Shifted Marketing Gears When It Became A Pure-Play Retail Brand

Believe it or not, car oil change service company Valvoline is in the midst of a fascinating retail marketing transformation.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

The Big Story: Live From CES 2026

Agents, streamers and robots, oh my! Live from the C-Space campus at the Aria Casino in Las Vegas, our team breaks down the most interesting ad tech trends we saw at CES this year.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.