Home AdExchanger Talks Adam Heimlich, Ad Tech Time Traveler

Adam Heimlich, Ad Tech Time Traveler

SHARE:

If competition advocate Adam Heimlich could travel back in time to alter the future of online advertising, he’d go to 2007, he says on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Not necessarily to stop Google’s imminent acquisition of DoubleClick, but rather to warn The Federal Trade Commission – which at the time was investigating the proposed merger from an anticompetition point of view – about something Google would do in 2016 years after the FTC had cleared the acquisition.

In 2007, there were privacy-related concerns that Google would combine its own search and cookie data with data from DoubleClick’s publisher customers to get an advantage in the market, Heimlich explains.

The FTC eventually determined this wouldn’t be an issue, and Google made a commitment before the deal closed to not combine the data. There were also contractual clauses in place prohibiting Google from merging its user data from Search, Gmail, YouTube and other properties with data gathered from non-Google sites.

Then, in 2016, Google changed the terms and conditions and combined all user data into a single ID. In the DOJ’s 2023 antitrust complaint – which is being adjudicated right now in a Virginia courtroom – the government argues that this move, referred to internally at Google as Project Narnia, proved “invaluable to Google’s efforts to build and maintain its monopoly across the ad tech industry.”

“In 2016, it wasn’t hard to argue that DV360 was a second-tier DSP that shouldn’t have significant share of trading desk spend,” Heimlich says. But being able to predict intent is really important for top- and mid-funnel display, he says, and, together with low CPMs, DV360 really started to take off.

The DOJ’s antitrust case against Google is focused on its alleged sell-side monopoly. But you can’t say combining the data into one ID didn’t give Google a leg up overall, Heimlich adds.

“I think that was where things really started to spiral toward the state of affairs that resulted in this trial eight years later,” he says.

Also in this episode: An update on Heimlich’s startup, Chalice Custom Algorithms; tips for how to identify when someone’s talking BS about AI; analyzing Google’s defense in its antitrust trial; and Heimlich’s personal Wu-Tang Clan connection.

For more articles featuring Adam Heimlich, click here.

Must Read

The Big Story: Live From CES 2026

Agents, streamers and robots, oh my! Live from the C-Space campus at the Aria Casino in Las Vegas, our team breaks down the most interesting ad tech trends we saw at CES this year.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

A few years ago, “data clean rooms” were all the ad tech trades could talk about. Fast-forward to 2026, and maybe advertisers don’t need to know what a data clean room is after all.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The AI Search Reckoning Is Dismantling Open Web Traffic – And Publishers May Never Recover

Publishers have been losing 20%, 30% and in some cases even as much as 90% of their traffic and revenue over the past year due to the rise of zero-click AI search.

No Waiting for May – CES Is Where The TV Upfront Season Starts 

If any single event can be considered the jumping-off point for TV upfronts, it’s the Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES), which kicks off this week in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Comic: This Is Our Year

Comic: This Is Our Year

It’s been 15 years since this comic first ran in January 2011, and there’s something both quaint and timeless about it. Here’s to more (and more) transparency in 2026, and happy New Year!