Home Ad Exchange News Why LiveRamp Quietly Sold Its Location Data Business Last Year

Why LiveRamp Quietly Sold Its Location Data Business Last Year

SHARE:

LiveRamp is distancing itself from location data.

AdExchanger has learned that in Q4 2019, the onboarder offloaded the location data-related portion of the business it got along with its 2016 acquisition of Arbor. Cuebiq, a location-intelligence company, bought the assets.

LiveRamp is keeping the rest of the Arbor business, which includes technology to connect first-party web and app data with unique hashed identifiers.

Both Cuebiq and LiveRamp confirmed the transaction.

The location data business has been getting a little hairy from a privacy perspective.

Geolocation data is covered under the California Consumer Privacy Act and under the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe; smartphone-derived location data is the target of scathing news reports; and new iOS features are coming out that aim to cut down on location tracking.

LiveRamp acquired Arbor, a marketplace for first-party publisher and app data, in November 2016, the same day it announced its intention to acquire Circulate, a startup that helps app developers monetize their user data. It spent $140 million to buy both companies.

Cuebiq bought Arbor’s location assets for a lot less.

Antonio Tomarchio, Cuebiq’s CEO, declined to comment on either the size of the transaction or the size of the location business it acquired from LiveRamp. But a source with knowledge of the deal told AdExchanger that Cuebiq paid somewhere in the neighborhood of $200,000, and that Arbor’s location-data business was worth less than $1 million a year to LiveRamp.

According to LiveRamp CEO Scott Howe, the divestiture was in line with LiveRamp’s wider strategy following the close of Acxiom’s sale to IPG in October 2018.

“We sold off our data manufacturing business and focused our strategy on operating a neutral and open marketplace to connect high-quality, ethically-sourced data sources with data buyers,” Howe said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

The sale of Arbor’s location data-related contracts to Cuebiq, which Howe called “a very insignificant legacy data business,” is in line with that strategy.

LiveRamp positions itself as a neutral and agnostic party that facilitates identity resolution but doesn’t actually own any data assets.

By the same token, it doesn’t make sense for LiveRamp to expose itself from a privacy perspective for an asset that brings in such a small amount of revenue and isn’t core to the business.

From Cuebiq’s perspective, the deal helps bolster its offline measurement capabilities.

“The rationale is to expand and strengthen our partnership with LiveRamp on … media agnostic offline measurement,” Tomarchio said.

Demand-side clients of Arbor’s location business became Cuebiq clients as part of the deal, and Cuebiq subsequently terminated any supply-side app partnerships that were in place since it already has direct app relationships through its own software development kit integrations.

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.