Home Ad Exchange News Account Sharing Ain’t Just A Netflix Thing; Will Congress Pass A Real Ad Tech Tax?

Account Sharing Ain’t Just A Netflix Thing; Will Congress Pass A Real Ad Tech Tax?

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Ye Shall Not Password!

Password sharing isn’t just a Netflix problem.

Streaming platforms have largely held their tongues because account sharing does have its benefits. For example, allowing people to share accounts helps grow a service’s audience base (although some promo subscription prices practically give the farm away).

But it’s costly. Research firm Parks Associates found that US video providers lost $9.1 billion to piracy in 2019 – and a third of that loss came directly from shared or stolen credentials, Marketing Brew reports.

Parks projects this total loss to balloon to $12.5 billion by 2024.

It’s a slippery dance, though. How do you make users pay without driving them away? There are subtle, middle paths to explore before jumping straight to “Eff you, pay me,” which looks like it’s going to be Netflix’s approach.

For one, streamers can limit concurrent viewing. Hulu, for instance, limits simultaneous streams to two screens, and HBO Max alerts an account’s credit card holder once a certain number of households are using the same account (aka snitching on kids using their parents’ log-in).

Here’s an important question, though: Will these tactics work? Streamers might lose some viewers as they clamp down on overall account abuses, but they’ll also snag some new subs.

The True Ad Tech Tax

A bipartisan group of senators is set to introduce an advertising antitrust bill that would force Google to divest its ad tech business, among other far-reaching changes.  

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Amazon Advertising and the Meta Audience Network (it’s still FAN, too bad, Meta) would be in the same boat, since the bill would restrict companies with more than $20 billion in annual ad revenue from also owning ad exchanges or other tools to buy and sell ads, Bloomberg reports.  

Companies with more than $5 billion in annual ad revenue would be compelled to “act in customers’ best interests” and provide more ad data transparency, such as the terms of winning bids and fees (ahem, the take rates) charged by the platform. 

Details are fuzzy for now, because the news is attributed to two anonymous leakers. The text itself isn’t cited.

Although bipartisan laws are regularly floated or even brought to the floor, they can’t move forward without the necessary votes. 

Still, this is yet another effort to throw open the Overton window on tech regulation and set the stage for a high-stakes lobbying campaign on the road to comprehensive federal legislation.

Take Your Medicine

This doctor doesn’t think cookies are good for your health.

A couple of years ago, an emergency medicine physician who declined third-party cookies was unable to access a needed medical journal because of obscure site cookie rules. It wasn’t an emergency. He reverted to accepting cookies and, presto, he got access. But the experience stuck in the doctor’s craw, and he started a medical and health care data research program across Penn Med and Carnegie Mellon. 

In its first year, the group mapped third-party data collection and tracking across online health sites and medical journals. The next step is to understand how the data could be used to make medical inferences and target ads. 

Can someone’s browsing history suggest a possible diabetes diagnosis, for instance, and if so does that change the ads they see?

“We’ve documented over and over again that most health-related web pages have some tracking,” says Dr. Ari Friedman, who runs the program. “What are the implications of that?”

Good question.

But Wait, There’s More!

Ad tech firms didn’t sound the alarm about false information in Gannett’s ad auctions. [WSJ]

Why in-app personalization, not probabilistic attribution, is the future of post-ATT advertising. [Mobile Dev Memo]

The Out of Home Advertising Association of America launched a new brand “council” to help advance the OOH industry. [release]

Netflix’s subscriber loss woes aren’t over. [Variety]

Toolkits: Discounted subscription trials and promo offers are here to stay. [blog]

Xandr will offer GumGum’s contextual targeting technology. [B+C]

You’re Hired!

Walgreens poaches Calvin Klein’s Linh Peters as its new CMO. [Ad Age]

Must Read

The Trade Desk Maintains Its High Growth Rate And Touts New Channels

“It’s hard not to be bullish about CTV when it’s both our largest channel and our fastest growing,” said The Trade Desk Founder and CEO Green during the company’s earnings report on Thursday.

After The Election, News Corp Has Harsh Words For Advertisers Who Avoided News

News Corp’s chief exec blasted “the blatant biases of ad agencies and ad associations,” which are “boycotting certain media properties” due to “personal political prejudices.”

LiveRamp Outperforms On Earnings And Lays Out Its Data Network Ambitions

LiveRamp reported an unexpected boost to Q3 revenue, from $160 million last year to $185 million in 2024, during its quarterly call with investors on Wednesday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.