• PROGRAMMATIC I/O Las Vegas//
  • Newsletter Sign-up
  • Log in
AdExchanger Homepage
  • Log in
  • Topics
    • News
    • AdExplainer
    • Advertisers
    • Publishers
    • Platforms
    • Mobile
    • Data
    • Commerce
    • TV and Video
  • Opinion
    • Data-Driven Thinking
    • The Sell Sider
    • On TV and Video
    • Content Studio
    • Comic Strip
  • Become A Member
    • Sign Up
  • Events & Awards
    • Programmatic I/O Las Vegas
    • Programmatic I/O New York
    • Industry Preview
    • AdExchanger Awards
    • Power Players
    • All Events
  • Podcasts
    • AdExchanger Talks
    • The Big Story
  • About Us
    • Advertise
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Contributor Guidelines
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • AdExchanger Homepage

  • AdExchanger.com

  • Menu
    • News
    • AdExplainer
    • Advertisers
    • Publishers
    • Platforms
    • Mobile
    • Data
    • Commerce
    • TV and Video
    • Data-Driven Thinking
    • The Sell Sider
    • On TV and Video
    • Content Studio
    • Comic Strip
    • Advertise
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Contributor Guidelines
  • Events
    • PROGRAMMATIC I/O LV
    • PROGRAMMATIC I/O NY
    • Programmatic Power Players
    • AdExchanger Awards
    • Industry Preview
    • All Events
  • Podcasts
    • AdExchanger Talks
    • The Big Story
  • Membership
    • Member Exclusives
    • Sign Up
  • Search
Connect

Must Read

AdExplainer: The Difference Between AVOD and FAST The Pivot To AVOD Is Happening And The Trade Desk Is Here For It How TikTok’s Ad Platform Stands After A Half Year Of Whirlwind Growth And New Products Why Alternate Currencies Probably Won’t Take Center Stage At This Year’s Upfronts AdExplainer: The Evolution Of Retail Media Facebook Advertisers Are Itching For Change As Bugs Infest Its Attribution Tech Programmatic Tech Is A Front For Psychological Warfare Amazon Sales And Profits Slip, But Advertising Powers Along TikTok Adds Third-Party Cookies To Its Pixel – And Tries To Eat Facebook’s Lunch
»

Account Sharing Ain’t Just A Netflix Thing; Will Congress Pass A Real Ad Tech Tax?

by AdExchanger // Thursday, May 5th, 2022 – 12:03 am

Share:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Ye Shall Not Password!

Password sharing isn’t just a Netflix problem.

Streaming platforms have largely held their tongues because account sharing does have its benefits. For example, allowing people to share accounts helps grow a service’s audience base (although some promo subscription prices practically give the farm away).

But it’s costly. Research firm Parks Associates found that US video providers lost $9.1 billion to piracy in 2019 – and a third of that loss came directly from shared or stolen credentials, Marketing Brew reports.

Parks projects this total loss to balloon to $12.5 billion by 2024.

It’s a slippery dance, though. How do you make users pay without driving them away? There are subtle, middle paths to explore before jumping straight to “Eff you, pay me,” which looks like it’s going to be Netflix’s approach.

For one, streamers can limit concurrent viewing. Hulu, for instance, limits simultaneous streams to two screens, and HBO Max alerts an account’s credit card holder once a certain number of households are using the same account (aka snitching on kids using their parents’ log-in).

Here’s an important question, though: Will these tactics work? Streamers might lose some viewers as they clamp down on overall account abuses, but they’ll also snag some new subs.

The True Ad Tech Tax

A bipartisan group of senators is set to introduce an advertising antitrust bill that would force Google to divest its ad tech business, among other far-reaching changes.  

Amazon Advertising and the Meta Audience Network (it’s still FAN, too bad, Meta) would be in the same boat, since the bill would restrict companies with more than $20 billion in annual ad revenue from also owning ad exchanges or other tools to buy and sell ads, Bloomberg reports.  

Companies with more than $5 billion in annual ad revenue would be compelled to “act in customers’ best interests” and provide more ad data transparency, such as the terms of winning bids and fees (ahem, the take rates) charged by the platform. 

Details are fuzzy for now, because the news is attributed to two anonymous leakers. The text itself isn’t cited.

Although bipartisan laws are regularly floated or even brought to the floor, they can’t move forward without the necessary votes. 

Still, this is yet another effort to throw open the Overton window on tech regulation and set the stage for a high-stakes lobbying campaign on the road to comprehensive federal legislation.

Take Your Medicine

This doctor doesn’t think cookies are good for your health.

A couple of years ago, an emergency medicine physician who declined third-party cookies was unable to access a needed medical journal because of obscure site cookie rules. It wasn’t an emergency. He reverted to accepting cookies and, presto, he got access. But the experience stuck in the doctor’s craw, and he started a medical and health care data research program across Penn Med and Carnegie Mellon. 

In its first year, the group mapped third-party data collection and tracking across online health sites and medical journals. The next step is to understand how the data could be used to make medical inferences and target ads. 

Can someone’s browsing history suggest a possible diabetes diagnosis, for instance, and if so does that change the ads they see?

“We’ve documented over and over again that most health-related web pages have some tracking,” says Dr. Ari Friedman, who runs the program. “What are the implications of that?”

Good question.

But Wait, There’s More!

Ad tech firms didn’t sound the alarm about false information in Gannett’s ad auctions. [WSJ]

Why in-app personalization, not probabilistic attribution, is the future of post-ATT advertising. [Mobile Dev Memo]

The Out of Home Advertising Association of America launched a new brand “council” to help advance the OOH industry. [release]

Netflix’s subscriber loss woes aren’t over. [Variety]

Toolkits: Discounted subscription trials and promo offers are here to stay. [blog]

Xandr will offer GumGum’s contextual targeting technology. [B+C]

You’re Hired!

Walgreens poaches Calvin Klein’s Linh Peters as its new CMO. [Ad Age]

Enjoying this content?

Sign up to be an AdExchanger Member today and get unlimited access to articles like this, plus proprietary data and research, conference discounts, on-demand access to event content, and more!

Join Today!

Related stories:

  • Google’s Affiliate Link Penalty; The Brand vs. Performance Mistake
  • Big Tech Throws Its Weight Around; Quartile Acquires Sidecar
  • IAB Adds Agencies, But May Have Lost Its Way; Can CPGs Stop The Gross Marketing Gimmicks Already?
  • Ad Tech Vets Help Sharpen Ad Tech Regs; New Antitrust Bills Are Up In Congress
  • LG Says It Won’t Charge Buyers If Their Ads Don’t Perform; BOK Is Back?
  • Talk about it:
  • No comments
  • Add a comment
 

Add a comment

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

Popular today on AdExchanger

  • Popular
  • Today Week Month All
  • AdExplainer: The Difference Between AVOD and FAST
  • SmileDirectClub CMO On Dealing With Signal Loss And Testing New Channels
  • 3 Steps For Developing In-House IDs That Are Actually Usable
  • The Big Story: TikTok’s Missing Attribution
  • Next-Gen Media-Buying AI Eliminates The Privacy Versus Performance Trade-Off
Ajax spinner
AdExchanger Homepage
  • Privacy Policy //
  • Subscribe //
  • Advertise //
  • Contact Us //
  • Diversity Inclusion & Equity
© 2022 Access Intelligence, LLC - All Rights Reserved