Home Ad Exchange News Google’s First-Price Auction Switch Is Making Header Bidding Partners Win More

Google’s First-Price Auction Switch Is Making Header Bidding Partners Win More


When Google Ad Manager tested the switch to unified first-price auctions this summer, it saw a handful of ad tech players start to win a greater share of ad impressions.

“First-price auctions have created a more competitive market,” director of product management Jason Bigler wrote in a blog post Thursday. DSPs, non-AdWords ad networks and header bidding partners using indirect line items collectively saw a rise in impressions won, he added.

Google buyers did not see a significant change in impressions won.

Google will fully switch to a unified first-price auction in the coming weeks after announcing the change in March. The exchange began testing the change on 1% of traffic in June and expanded the test to 10% of traffic in August.

The increase in competition has been expected by publishers and ad exchanges that have long pointed out ways Google Ad Manager ran an un-unified, and therefore unfair, auction.

In the previous second-price auction model, Google reserved a “last look” advantage that allowed it to bid last after everyone had already submitted their bids. It could win impressions for a penny more than the highest bidder, allowing it to cherry-pick valuable users and clear more impressions than its competitors.

Since a first-price auction requires everyone to state their bid upfront, Google had to lose its last look advantage when it made the product change. Google declined to share how much its impression share dropped.

Google’s motions to dismantle the advantages it created for itself have been years in the making.

To bring more competition into programmatic auctions, publishers started adopting header bidding four years ago, which undermined Google’s ad server advantage. In response, Google developed its own version of header bidding, known as exchange bidding (recently renamed to open bidding). The new product let outside exchanges compete alongside Google’s exchange.

But Google still held the last look advantage, until Google Ad Manager became the last major exchange to move to a first-price auction in March – amid mounting pressure from antitrust investigations and two weeks after the Federal Trade Commission assembled a 13-attorney task force to investigate anticompetitive conduct in US technology markets, including online advertising.

Publishers won’t see a big revenue impact


AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Google also assured publishers that its early tests on 10% of inventory showed a neutral to positive revenue impact.

That finding is important, because first-price auctions can encourage buyers to submit lowball bids to save money, a practice known as bid shading. Aggressive bid shading could hurt publishers. Most bid shading algorithms yield a 20% savings for buyers – meaning publishers could see an equal decline.

As buyers adjust how they bid shade and publishers manage their floors, or the minimum price they will accept, the revenue impact could change. However, Google said it expected a neutral-to-positive long-term impact from the switch.

More data transparency

As Google moves to a first-price auction model, it said it will enter a beta on the next phase of its transparency push. Publishers and buyers will both gain access to new data to make them smarter about programmatic auctions.

Publishers will be able to see the number of bidders in an auction and the price range in which they bid. They can also look at the bid landscape by ad unit and the DSP or advertiser purchasing the inventory. But they can’t use the data to figure out what individual users might be the most valuable to advertisers.

Buyers and exchanges will be able to see the minimum bid price needed to win an auction after it closes, allowing them to tweak their buying strategies and improve their win rate.

Google also said that it increased the number of pricing rules a publisher could use to manage its inventory, after publishers pushed back over low early limits. Google upped the limit to 200 from 100, and allowed additional publishers exceptions to run with higher limits.

Updated to reflect that the changed limit was for pricing rules.

Must Read

Forget ROAS? The New Retail Metrics Game

Hey Readers, Welcome back to the AdExchanger Commerce Media Newsletter. Thanks for reading! This week, we’re examining the challenges involving online ad metrics. Which are, for the most part, relics of a bygone age. Take last-touch attribution or when a passing glance at half an ad gets rubber-stamped as viewable. And don’t get me started […]


Perion Shutters Content IQ, Its Made-For-Advertising Division

Laptop fans can rest a little easier. A network of well-known MFA sites operated by Perion-owned Content IQ have been taken offline.

‘Incrementality’ Is The Buzzword That Stole Prog IO

Well, that’s a wrap on Programmatic IO Las Vegas 2024! The AdExchanger editorial hopped on stage for a live recording of The Big Story to round up all the moments that made us go “a-ha” this week, including observations on commerce media, CTV and generative AI.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Paramount And Shopsense Add Programmatic Demand To Their Shoppable Ad Network

What if the new storefront is a person sitting on their couch and scrolling their phone?

Scott’s Miracle-Gro Is Seeing Green With Retail Media

It’s lawn season – and you know what that means. Scott’s Miracle-Gro commercials, of course. Except this time, spots for Scott’s will be brought to you by The Home Depot’s retail media network.

Walled Garden Platforms Are Drowning Marketers In Self-Attributed Sales

Sales are way up; ROAS is through the roof across search, social and ecommerce. At least, that’s what the ad platforms say.