Home Ad Exchange News Correction: On Our Story About Facebook Exchange Frequency Capping

Correction: On Our Story About Facebook Exchange Frequency Capping

SHARE:

facebook exchangeA story reported here yesterday was missing some key nuances in how the Facebook Exchange will work. The below is our clarification and correction based on new information shared by Facebook and its DSP partners.

Sources told AdExchanger yesterday, and Facebook confirmed at the time, that frequency capping would not be possible through the new Facebook Exchange – nor would view-through tracking or impression tracking.  We also noted the technical challenges inherent in the requirement that advertisers upload creative to Facebook and submit to a hybrid human/automated approval process.

We passed this on to readers, but not all of it was accurate.

As it turns out, frequency capping will work on the Facebook Exchange, as will impression tracking. However, Facebook says, “We don’t have view through at this time.”

It’s important to understand the method for impression tracking is substantially different from what programmatic media buyers are used to. Facebook DSP partners tell us it will function not by allowing third party ad servers to drop a cookie, but through a technical process intended to protect the security of Facebook’s social graph data.

“In a sense, after you serve the ad, the confirmation comes back from Facebook that gets recorded by the DSP,” said Mike Baker, CEO of DataXu, one of Facebook’s eight approved partners. “They’re passing us our IDs. It’s a workaround so that the social graph data is not unintentionally leaked outside of Facebook. That’s why they don’t like to have the pixels put in there.”

AdExchanger regrets the error! Please bear with us while we continue to shine a light on the Facebook Exchange.

-Zach Rodgers

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.