Home CTV Attention Vendors Team Up To Crack The YouTube Measurement Code

Attention Vendors Team Up To Crack The YouTube Measurement Code

SHARE:

YouTube and connected TV are hot media channels, but they’re also among the ad market’s most impenetrable black boxes.

Making matters more complicated for marketers is that viewers are increasingly watching YouTube via CTV, where measurement signals are even scarcer than on the web.

CTV now accounts for 38% of all time spent watching YouTube, according to TV measurement company TVision. Meanwhile, YouTube accounts for 17% of all CTV watch time, making it the most-watched CTV app.

With YouTube’s CTV viewership growing, TVision and attention measurement company Playground XYZ announced a partnership on Thursday to measure attention on YouTube’s CTV app and fill in some data blanks for advertisers.

Going around the black box

Both TVision and Playground XYZ can measure the attention viewers pay to ads via opt-in panels. TVision contributes the CTV data, and Playground XYZ contributes the web and mobile data. Together, this provides an actionable measurement signal for marketers so they don’t have to rely on YouTube or Google.

The new partnership combines their panel data and uses the attention-scoring capability within Playground’s Attention Intelligence Platform as a shared resource. The combined data set is available to any of Playground XYZ’s clients through the company’s dashboard.

Because both companies also measure attention in several other media channels, the combined attention scoring can be used to compare YouTube campaign performance to linear TV, as well as other CTV apps and even mobile, said TVision CEO Yan Liu.

In addition, there’s also a cross-channel component for measuring performance by device type, because together the companies can measure YouTube on CTV, mobile and desktop, said Playground XYZ CEO Rob Hall.

The partnership is already producing some interesting cross-channel findings. For example, TVision found that viewers are 14% more attentive on average when watching a CTV app than they are when watching linear TV. And viewers are 74% more likely to watch CTV with another person than they are when watching linear TV.

Playground XYZ also found that YouTube’s bumper and non-skippable ad formats receive 25% less attention on CTV devices – meaning smart TVs – than on other devices. That’s likely because viewers typically leave the room or pay attention to their mobile devices during ad breaks when they’re watching on their TV.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Such insights can help advertisers with campaign optimization based on device type, Hall said. Playground XYZ’s dashboard breaks down attention data using parameters such as targeting method, ad creative, ad format, time of day and day of the week, all of which can be used to direct spend toward the tactics and strategies that garner the most attention.

The TrueView on attention standardization

One thing the partnership won’t help marketers measure, however, is campaign performance across YouTube’s TrueView audience extension and its network of third-party Google Video Partner (GVP) sites.

That’s because the partnership is only suited for measuring in-app YouTube ad inventory, which is equivalent to a user visiting youtube.com. TrueView also includes off-site ad inventory from the GVP network.

And, unfortunately, the lack of standardization in attention metrics across vendors means it isn’t easy to compare YouTube inventory to GVP inventory.

Even if an advertiser used Playground XYZ and TVision to measure YouTube inventory and another attention vendor to measure off-site inventory, comparing the data would be like comparing apples to oranges, Hall said.

To get a holistic picture of attention across YouTube’s audience extension network would require more standardization and cooperation between measurement vendors.

But the partnership between TVision and Playground XYZ is a productive first step toward shedding more light into YouTube.

“Measurement companies need to work together to provide as much data as possible to brands,” Liu said. “Because even if Google has some data, they’re not sharing all that data back to the clients.”

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

A few years ago, “data clean rooms” were all the ad tech trades could talk about. Fast-forward to 2026, and maybe advertisers don’t need to know what a data clean room is after all.

The AI Search Reckoning Is Dismantling Open Web Traffic – And Publishers May Never Recover

Publishers have been losing 20%, 30% and in some cases even as much as 90% of their traffic and revenue over the past year due to the rise of zero-click AI search.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

No Waiting for May – CES Is Where The TV Upfront Season Starts 

If any single event can be considered the jumping-off point for TV upfronts, it’s the Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES), which kicks off this week in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Comic: This Is Our Year

Comic: This Is Our Year

It’s been 15 years since this comic first ran in January 2011, and there’s something both quaint and timeless about it. Here’s to more (and more) transparency in 2026, and happy New Year!

From AI To SPO: The Top 10 AdExchanger Guest Columns Of 2025

The generative AI trend generated endless hot takes this year, but the ad industry also had plenty to say about growing competition between DSPs and SSPs. Here are AdExchanger’s top 10 most popular guest columns of 2025 and why they resonated.