Home The Sell Sider Publishers Must Unite Around A Consumer-Facing Consent Standard

Publishers Must Unite Around A Consumer-Facing Consent Standard

SHARE:

The Sell Sider” is a column written for the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Mark Dye, chief strategy officer at Bombora.

Digital publishers have long been challenged to hold onto their fair share of the market. But publishers may never have felt more squeezed than they do now, as new privacy regulations and browser policies limit the ways they can use data about their readers to sell ad inventory.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and privacy-focused updates by Google and Apple affect the entire industry, from advertiser to publisher to consumer. So it’s time for publishers to band together to speak with a single voice, in the form of industry standards, to deal with these new regulations and value exchanges.

And B2B publishers in particular could play a special role in testing how these standards would work.

Lessons learned from GDPR

One of the key learnings from the GDPR rollout is that there has been no consistency in the consumer experience for consent. While GDPR is designed to provide universal controls for how consumer data is stored and shared, the actual landscape that consumers must navigate is fragmented and confusing. Consumers must interact with many user interfaces as they move across the web. They often differ on the placement of the opt-in button, the opt-in language, options and data usage descriptions, just to name a few.

For any standard to succeed, publishers must adopt it widely, and it must be clear and consistent with other consumer-facing UIs, so consumers can easily move through the consent workflow. This is the best path to resolve the two key challenges of compliance and an open internet.

Compliance is obviously a primary concern for publishers. By collaborating on a standard UI, publishers demonstrate that they take consumer privacy seriously. Working collectively ensures that all sites can manage compliance and consent easily and effectively. It also enables publishers to speak with a unified voice to regulators, showing a shared commitment to the greater good, along with strength in numbers.

This unified voice is integral to promoting and maintaining an open internet. If the goal of a standard is to achieve a clear value exchange, part of that effort must be devoted to educating audiences about how anonymous data will continue to grant access to content.

A unique window of opportunity

The tricky part is finding a way to test this standard in action. If we can all agree that the GDPR implementation, from a consumer perspective, has been choppy at best ­– one that exposed publishers “doing the right thing” to significant risk – then we need to learn from this experience for CCPA. But news, lifestyle and pretty much all consumer-facing sites represent huge swaths of the internet, and it would be hard to maintain consistency across domains.

There is one publishing community that is small enough to universally adopt a standard and a consistent UI, but still have the kind of scale to determine if it works: B2B publishers. This group typically has a clear and unique relationship with its audience. Readers need the content to do their jobs, creating a very different environment in which to communicate to end users.

B2B publishers are also in a position to lead because there is largely still a wait-and-see attitude toward CCPA, and the data that is collected by B2B publishers is done “as a normal course of business.” This is specifically because legislators recognize what makes this relationship different.

B2B publishers can pave the way for a consistent UI that is adopted across the web. This standard would look and feel the same across diverse sites and clearly contain:

  1. A simple explanation of the value exchange between the publisher and audience
  2. Opt-in and opt-out language
  3. Data definitions and usage FAQs

If B2B publishers can execute this task, they would have a great opportunity to build something substantial that could scale across consumer-facing content. It would also give publishers of all kinds the tools to engage with both consumers and legislators, leading the publishing industry into a new era of privacy education and management.

Follow Bombora (@bomboradata) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Why Wall Street Turned Against The Trade Desk

The Trade Desk is less than a third as valuable as it was a year ago. It retains about one-tenth of its high-water market cap from December 2024, when the company was worth almost $70 billion. Why did investors lose the faith?

Garrett McGrath, President, Prebid.org

Prebid’s New President Is Its Former Chairman, Garrett McGrath

McGrath left Prebid in June following five years as board chairman after stepping down as SVP of product management at Magnite. But now, overseeing Prebid will be his full-time job.

TV Manufacturer Telly Touts Programmatic Home Screen Ads

Telly, the startup that gives away free smart TVs in exchange for data and ad exposure, is making its home screen ads available for brands to buy programmatically – and pushing for industry standards to help attract more spend. 

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Is Helping L’Oréal Brainstorm Unique Ways To Reach Male Audiences

L’Oréal adopted creative AI platform Springboards to generate creative ideas that led to a collaborative, ongoing ideation process.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

Google won’t have to break up its ads business after being declared an online monopolist. Meanwhile, Amazon faces a lawsuit from the FTC alleging that it charged advertisers more than necessary for ecommerce ads.

The FTC’s Amazon Lawsuit Is Ad Tech’s History Of Opacity Repeating Itself

Buy-side experts said it’s another example of a Big Tech platform taking advantage of the lack of transparency built into programmatic ad auctions. And they’re not optimistic change is coming.