Home The Big Story The Third Delay For Third-Party Cookies Leaves Ad Tech In Limbo

The Third Delay For Third-Party Cookies Leaves Ad Tech In Limbo

SHARE:
Logo for AdExchanger's Big Story podcast, with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Well, folks, it’s happened again. For the third time, Google pushed back its original deadline to remove third-party cookies from Chrome. On Tuesday, it said it would no longer remove cookies in 2024, and didn’t set a new deadline for removal.

On this week’s episode, the editorial team talks through this latest announcement from Google, and how the delay will affect the rest of ad tech’s plans to go cookieless.

But first, how did we get here? Leading up to this moment, it seemed like Google would finally quit cookies.

At the beginning of this year, Google removed cookies for 1% of Chrome traffic in January, which is more than it has done over the previous four years. With promises backed up by action, many believed Google’s assertion that it would fully remove cookies in the second half of 2024.

At the same time that Google was planning to deprecate third-party cookies, the pushback on its replacement, the Privacy Sandbox, intensified.

The IAB Tech Lab released a scathing report showing all the areas where its Privacy Sandbox Task Force deemed a replacement wasn’t ready in February. And industry testers shared a chorus of concerns about details of the Privacy Sandbox, from latency to its in-browser decisioning to its waterfall-like auction setup that seemed to preference Google. The business implications of these complicated technical details are still being untangled by the ad tech community.

Meanwhile, almost every ad tech company now has some sort of cookieless solution, with varying levels of performance or adoption. And other mobile browsers and apps don’t use cookies – but often, seem like they still can’t entice buyers to shift budget from cookie-enriched Chrome. With the latest pushback, ad tech remains in limbo. It’s a strange place to be. But we’re here with you to talk it out.

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.