Home Technology Jounce Partners With Self-Serve Buying Platform AdLib To Block MFA By Default

Jounce Partners With Self-Serve Buying Platform AdLib To Block MFA By Default

SHARE:
Comic: The MFA Cafe

Good news for the MFA averse: Buy-side platforms can block made-for-advertising sites by default – if they want to, that is.

AdLib, a self-serve buying platform that connects to DSPs, announced a partnership on Wednesday with Jounce Media, which analyzes programmatic supply chains. The purpose is to ensure that supply purchased through AdLib’s platform is MFA-free and to improve AdLib’s curation capabilities.

The partnership also allows AdLib to make MFA-blocking tools more accessible to midsize buyers, said Founder and CEO Mike Hauptman. AdLib is now offering the ability to exclude MFA from campaigns as a free addition to its general offering.

Most MFA-blocking solutions charge a CPM-based fee, which midsize advertisers typically can’t afford, said Jounce Media Founder Chris Kane.

Plus, as a buying solution that operates as an added layer on top of DSP integrations, AdLib can block MFA regardless of whether a DSP is willing to proactively filter it.

“There’s a lot to be said for defaults here,” Kane said, “and there are very few DSPs with the willingness to have aggressive defaults.”

Building blocks

Jounce, which has been at the forefront of industry efforts to redefine MFA as “made for arbitrage” (rather than “made for advertising,” because what isn’t?) offers an exclusion list of sites that meet its MFA criteria.

These criteria focus on publishers that attract mostly paid traffic and whose sites have a high ad-to-content ratio.

AdLib licenses Jounce’s list and applies it to all campaigns running through its buying platform. Although this exclusion list will be turned on by default, buyers can request not to use it, Hauptman said.

Rather than blocking individual site pages, Jounce’s exclusion list works at the domain level. However, in response to stories like the one about Forbes operating a secret MFA subdomain, Jounce has prioritized getting better at catching subdomains that are associated with MFA activity, Kane said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

To keep up with the whac-a-mole game of identifying new MFA sites, Jounce and AdLib update their exclusion lists daily – including removing any sites that have been erroneously flagged or that have corrected the bad practices that got them labeled as MFA.

Curation collaboration

But blocking is only part of the solution. AdLib also licenses Jounce’s inclusion lists to curate in-demand pools of inventory across trusted publishers.

And AdLib can tap into Jounce’s knowledge of the programmatic supply chain to help buyers control how much inventory they’re buying from specific publishers.

For example, say a tier-three auto company wants to buy CTV inventory only from NBC, Fox, CBS and ABC. Typically, this inventory would be associated with thousands of separate bundle IDs.

DSPs are not engineered to tie these IDs to specific publishers, Kane said. That task typically falls to agencies – and most midtier and smaller marketers can’t afford these services, either.

But part of Jounce’s daily work is analyzing bundle IDs in programmatic deals to determine which IDs are associated with which publishers. As part of this partnership, AdLib gets access to that data as well.

“We basically input a publisher, and on a daily basis, [Jounce] gives us back the whole universe of known IDs [associated with that publisher],” Hauptman said. “So that solves that problem for the midmarket.”

Shrinking MFA’s share

By giving a wider range of advertisers access to these tools, it helps the industry divert ad budgets away from MFA sites and toward deserving publishers.

Such efforts have already contributed to a drop-off in spending on MFA sites. According to Jounce’s analysis, MFA bid request volume peaked at 30% in July 2023, but has since fallen to 10%.

However, that 10% figure can vary widely across individual DSPs, Kane said. And while MFA’s share of ad budgets is shrinking, one in 10 bid requests still come from these sites.

Ultimately, MFA persists because SSPs keep it in the supply chain.

But DSPs cap how many bid requests SSPs can send them per second, Kane said. So, if buyers use solutions like AdLib to block MFA supply, SSPs will notice DSPs aren’t buying as many MFA impressions as they used to and will send more impressions from reputable publishers instead.

“You’ll start to open up access to quality supply that was previously getting filtered out of the bidstream,” Kane said. “This is where the solution, I think, can change the overall shape of the industry.”

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.