Home Research Where Retail Brands Fall Flat On Tablets

Where Retail Brands Fall Flat On Tablets

SHARE:

L2Tablet usage is on the rise but retailers have yet to catch up, shows a new report by research company L2. As more people spend time on tablets—which L2 categorizes as a separate device from a PC or mobile device—retailers need to adopt a distinct strategy for engaging shoppers on their tablets.

“Tablets have been treated as an adjunct to either smartphone or desktop development efforts and it shows,” Colin Gilbert, digital strategy consultant at L2, told AdExchanger. “Brands have to be cognizant of the unique experiences tablets offer versus a smartphone or a PC.”

The research company studied 60 retail brands’ app and site experiences on iPads. The brands included various apparel, accessories, housewares, and online retailers such as Aeropostale, JC Penney, Williams-Sonoma, Cartier, Net-A-Porter, and Sephora.

L2 found that 83% of the brands replicated their desktop site experience on tablets, and sent tablet users to their website to complete a transaction. “The majority of apps,” Gilbert commented, “still push users to the browser to commence or complete a transaction—a clunky solution that interrupts the experience and risks user abandonment.”

Only 13% of the brands’ sites supported any touch-and-swipe functionality beyond scrolling and most brand sites took 2.5 times longer to load on tablets than on desktops (4.4 seconds versus 1.8 seconds). In addition, one in three brands did not support “cart continuity,” forcing consumers to redo their selections when switching devices during a transaction. Among the brands that offered a mobile app for the iPad, only 10% offered an in-app checkout service.

The report also highlighted a few brands that showed a “flash of genius.” Nike earned credit for its “sticky” sidebar filters that offer finger-friendly menu items and the NIKEiD customization engine that shows 360-degree views of the footwear. Kate Spade’s in-store iPads received a nod for its emphasis on brand immersion. The tablets include videos, walkthroughs, promotions, and content relevant to nearby clothing.

IDC predicts tablet shipments will surpass desktop PCs this year, and will exceed portable PCs like laptops by 2014. Given that tablets are still relatively new however, it is understandable that many brands are still learning how to best leverage the technology, Gilbert said.

To bring themselves up to speed, Gilbert suggests companies start with ensuring that the layout of their tablet-enabled sites are making efficient use of space. “A lot of brands aren’t providing variable content sizing for images and text,” he commented.

An optimized site loads at speeds on par with the desktop, the site adapts to either orientation mode (portrait or landscape), and texts, buttons and images are sized appropriately for fingers. “It’s these small details,” Gilbert noted “where most brand efforts fall flat.”

As for paid media, in an earlier study that looked at 100 brands, L2 found that only 25% of the brands examined were serving different ads on different devices by taking advantage of local directions, embedded “call” boutique buttons, or mobile-centric offers.

While this finding is more specific to delineating between smartphone versus desktop ad strategies, Gilbert noted, it is “still indicative of the ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to digital favored by many brands.”

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.