Home Privacy Lawmakers Call RTB An Unfair And Deceptive Business Practice In Letter To The FTC

Lawmakers Call RTB An Unfair And Deceptive Business Practice In Letter To The FTC

SHARE:
It's ... complicated.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers is pushing the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the practice of real-time bidding. (Read the letter here.)

In a letter addressed to FTC Chairman Joseph Simons on Friday, the group, led by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Bill Cassidy, R-La., decries what it calls a “widespread privacy violations by companies in the advertising technology industry.”

Other signatories include Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Democratic Reps. Anna Eshoo Zoe Lofgren of California. Eshoo and Lofgren introduced a sweeping privacy bill in the House late last year.

Ad tech companies, the letter says, “are selling private data about millions of Americans collected without their knowledge or consent from their phones, computers and smart TVs,” such as device IDs, cookies, location data, IP addresses, gender, age and other demographic data.

This argument is the same one at the heart of a series of complaints filed in Europe which allege that RTB is a violation under the General Data Protection Regulation, because there’s no way to collect informed consent for the sort of intricate data processing that takes place as part of every bid request in a real-time auction.

For more than a year, privacy advocates have been lodging simultaneous complaints on that theme with data protection authorities across the EU.

In May of 2019, for example, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission opened a formal investigation into whether Google’s ad exchange data-processing practices violate the GDPR.

Bid steamed

The letter to the FTC specifically highlights how exchanges will sometimes participate in RTB auctions solely for the purpose of collecting bidstream data “without ever intending to win the auction.”

“Hundreds of potential bidders receive this information, even though only one – the auction winner – will use it to deliver an advertisement,” the letter contends.

Some supply-side platforms have started cutting off exchanges that purposely bid low simply as a way to gain data rather than as a serious bidder in an auction.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But lawmakers are still incensed by the practice. “Few Americans realize that companies are siphoning off and storing that ‘bidstream data’ to compile exhaustive dossiers about them,” the letter declares.

Special ire is reserved for MobileWalla, a mobile data provider that used location data from phones to profile more than 17,000 Black Lives Matter protesters, according to a June BuzzFeed report, and created segments of evangelicals during the 2016 US presidential election by tracking their location in real time on Election Day.

“There is no effective way to control these tools absent intervention by regulators and Congress,” the letter goes on to say.

In closing, Wyden, Cassidy and co. urge the FTC to use its authority to determine whether ad tech companies and “their data broker partners” have violated federal laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive business practices.

And that, at least for now, is pretty much all that can be done at a federal level, absent a national privacy law, which has almost no chance of passing in this congress.

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.