Home Platforms Zipcar Is Not Keen On Black Boxes

Zipcar Is Not Keen On Black Boxes

SHARE:

ZipcarAccordantIt’s been about three years since Zipcar left its digital ad agency in the rearview mirror, and the brand hasn’t looked back.

The car-sharing company shifted all of its online ad buying to programmatic channels, turning to Accordant Media, whose stack includes a demand-side platform, an audience-buying platform, analytics, cross-channel attribution and a dynamic creative module.

“Before, we were working with a traditional agency and it really was a black box,” said Andrew Daley, VP of marketing and member acquisition at Zipcar, speaking at AdExchanger’s Programmatic I/O show in New York City on Thursday. “We saw the output, but we didn’t know the ‘why’ behind it – the cost, the pricing, the fees, the margins.”

Zipcar was far from impressed with that lack of transparency, and programmatic, nascent three years ago, seemed like a viable alternative.

“We started thinking [about] how do we take [this] in-house so we have more control,” Daley said.

But as Daley and his team started researching options, one thing became clear: Placing tags, handling quality assurance testing, constantly turning knobs and dials and managing an internal enterprise system did not appeal.

“[We could have] probably cobbled together some kind of ad tech stack ourselves – I actually got pressure to do that – but take one look at the LUMAscape and you start to cry,” Daley said. “We didn’t want to go there.”

Which is why Zipcar decided to tap an outside player to tackle the back end, preferring to spend its time focusing on what Daley called “the good stuff” – strategy rather than ad ops.

Although some might refer to the Zipcar/Accordant relationship as more of a managed-service arrangement rather than straight-up in-house programmatic – which arguably requires brand hands on keyboards – what is clear is that Zipcar was not satisfied with the agency status quo.

It boiled down to the desire for greater control, enhanced efficiency and actionable insights. Daley was looking for more than a peek behind the curtain; he wanted to do away with the curtain altogether.

“What’s happening behind the scenes? What are the inventory sources? We want to have some way and ability to work collaboratively and be part of the discussion,” Daley said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

One of the main things Zipcar wanted to tackle was data – namely, data activation. Although Zipcar had what Accordant CEO and co-founder Art Muldoon called a “rich treasure trove of data” – everything from CRM data to customer service data – it existed in disparate legacy systems, making it hard to activate.

Accordant helped Zipcar get a handle on its first-party data, organizing it into discrete customer profiles. From there, additional behavioral data, both second- and third-party, were layered into the mix to run prospecting campaigns across Zipcar’s 25 US markets.

And throughout the process, Zipcar and Accordant continue to work hand in glove.

“There is a lot of disconnect in programmatic around the use of algorithms – it can be a black box,” said Muldoon. “In the spirit of transparency, we really work hard to help clients understand the signals behind the noise.”

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.