Home Platforms Google Commits To A More Level Ad Tech Playing Field In Big Antitrust Settlement With France

Google Commits To A More Level Ad Tech Playing Field In Big Antitrust Settlement With France

SHARE:
Google has agreed to pay a $268 million fine and make changes to its advertising busines to settle a precedent-setting anticompetition case in France.
Google logo seen on the smartphone placed next to the judges gavel. Concept for a lawsuit, legal case, antitrust and fine. Real photo, not a montage. Stafford, United Kingdom - December 15 2020:

No more laissez-faire.

Google has agreed to pay a $268 million fine and make changes to its advertising business to settle a precedent-setting anticompetition case in France.

The settlement, announced on Monday, was reached with the Autorité de la Concurrence (ADLC), France’s competition authority, and marks the first time that an antitrust regulator has been able to ding Google for unfairly promoting its own services in the online advertising sector to the detriment of the rest of the ecosystem.

In other words, guess we don’t have to say “allegedly” anymore.

Les concessions

Under the terms of the settlement, Google promised to ensure that all buyers, including those using a non-Google DSP to bid into a publisher’s header bidding set-up, will get equal access to data related to the outcome of Ad Manager auctions. It’s long been an industry gripe that Google advantages its own buy side auctions for header bidding.

Google also committed to improve interoperability between Google Ad Manager and third-party ad servers and to give publishers the ability to set their own pricing rules and custom floors for ads that fall into sensitive categories, such as gambling and politics.

On top of that, Google said it’s “reaffirming” it will not place limits on a publisher’s ability to negotiate specific terms or pricing with other SSPs and will not use data from other SSPs to optimize bids in its exchange in a way that other supply-side platforms can’t reproduce.

If that last bit sounds familiar, it’s because unfair data use is the central allegation at the heart of Project Bernanke.

In April, The Wall Street Journal obtained mistakenly unredacted court filings as part of the Texas-led antitrust lawsuit against Google which appear to demonstrate that Google secretly relied on publisher ad server data fed into its ad buying systems as a way to suppress prices and gain market share.

It’s possible that the recent Project Bernanke revelations helped the French bolster its own probe of Google’s ad practices.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Facts of the case

The decision to sanction Google has “special significance because it is the first decision in the world to examine the complex algorithmic bidding processes by which online advertising works,” said Isabelle de Silva, president of the French competition authority, in a statement about the settlement.

Specifically, the French case focused on whether Google abused its dominant position in the ad server market and gave preferential treatment to its proprietary ad tech. Google was accused of allowing Google Ad Manager (formerly DoubleClick for Publishers) to favor Google’s own exchange.

France first launched its investigation in 2019 after receiving a joint complaint from a coalition of publishers led by News Corp, Le Figaro and Rossel, a Belgian media group.

The practices in question are “particularly serious,” according to the ADLC, because they penalized web publishers, app publishers and Google’s competitors in the SSP market.

It’s important to note that Google is not disputing or appealing the settlement.

And its avowal could be significant for other ongoing antitrust cases against Google, including the Texas case and the suit brought by the US Department of Justice. Google has officially acknowledged that it’s able to change its systems to make it easier for publishers to use data and operate in its ecosystem.

Although “the fine is immaterial for a company of Google’s size and market dominance, the settlement with a major regulator affirms and strengthens the investigations and lawsuits globally against the company,” said Jason Kint, CEO of publisher trade group Digital Context Next.

And if changes can be made in one market, why not globally?

Testing and rollout

According to Reuters, some of the changes Google has pledged to make to its ad tech tools and practices will be implemented by the first quarter of next year …

… just in time, it so happens, for the planned deprecation of third-party cookies in Chrome, which also happens to be a potential antitrust landline for Google. Looks like 2022 is going to be an interesting year.

To start the product updates will only apply to France – and only be mandatory for three years – although Google says it plans to test and develop them over the coming months “before rolling them out more broadly, including some globally.”

A Google spokeswoman told AdExchanger that, as of now, the global changes will include more robust support for header bidding and the custom pricing rules for sensitive ad categories.

Must Read

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.